From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:44:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Probe tcon0 during
 dsi_bind
In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZCsEYFJOQAFTf3FspQWMzD-tiW_njuyCJ950RZ=Y6apEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20181116163916.29621-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
 <20181116163916.29621-7-jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
 <20181119083833.d7ysiv3tenabtrdj@flea>
 <CAMty3ZCsEYFJOQAFTf3FspQWMzD-tiW_njuyCJ950RZ=Y6apEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20181120154429.e4jcn2xxkbh3fits@flea>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 05:06:32PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:08 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:09:10PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Probe tcon0 during dsi_bind, so-that the tcon attributes like
> > > divider value, clock rate can get whenever it need.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 7 +++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h | 1 +
> > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > index d60955880c43..66a01061e51d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > >  #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> > >
> > >  #include "sun4i_drv.h"
> > > +#include "sun4i_tcon.h"
> > >  #include "sun6i_mipi_dsi.h"
> > >
> > >  #include <video/mipi_display.h>
> > > @@ -1007,6 +1008,7 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> > >       struct drm_device *drm = data;
> > >       struct sun4i_drv *drv = drm->dev_private;
> > >       struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +     struct sun4i_tcon *tcon0 = sun4i_get_tcon0(drm);
> > >       int ret;
> > >
> > >       if (!dsi->panel)
> > > @@ -1014,6 +1016,11 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> > >
> > >       dsi->drv = drv;
> > >
> > > +     if (!tcon0)
> > > +             return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >
> > You can't fall in that condition. The component framework won't call
> > bind unless every components have been probed.
> 
> Since tcon0 is already probed is it? if so I can return -EINVAL is it ok?

Sounds good yes.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20181120/b08a8952/attachment.sig>