From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:06:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: capabilities: Merge entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE In-Reply-To: <1541418917-14219-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> References: <1541418917-14219-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <1541418917-14219-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Message-ID: <20181126140603.GA29684@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:55:11AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > We have two entries for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE capability : > > 1) ARM Errata 826319, 827319, 824069, 819472 on A53 r0p[012] > 2) ARM Errata 819472 on A53 r0p[01] > > Both have the same work around. Merge these entries to avoid > duplicate entries for a single capability. > > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Andre Przywara > Cc: Mark Rutland > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 19 +++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c > index a509e351..c825bc0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c > @@ -573,24 +573,19 @@ static const struct midr_range arm64_harden_el2_vectors[] = { > const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_826319) || \ > defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_827319) || \ > - defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_824069) > + defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_824069) || \ > + defined(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_819472) > { > - /* Cortex-A53 r0p[012] */ > - .desc = "ARM errata 826319, 827319, 824069", > + /* > + * Cortex-A53 r0p[012]: ARM errata 826319, 827319, 824069 > + * Cortex-A53 r0p[01] : ARM errata 819472 > + */ > + .desc = "ARM errata 826319, 827319, 824069, 819472", > .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_CLEAN_CACHE, > ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A53, 0, 0, 2), > .cpu_enable = cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap, Isn't this a semantic change wrt the Kconfig options? After this change, if I /only/ set CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_819472=y, then I still get the workaround applied for CPUs > r0[p01] which isn't what I asked for. Will