linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Use a raw spinlock in __install_bp_hardening_cb()
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:15:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127191521.GA5641@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127153521.29182-1-james.morse@arm.com>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:35:21PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> __install_bp_hardening_cb() is called via stop_machine() as part
> of the cpu_enable callback. To force each CPU to take its turn
> when allocating slots, they take a spinlock.
> 
> With the RT patches applied, the spinlock becomes a mutex,
> and we get warnings about sleeping while in stop_machine():
> | [    0.319176] CPU features: detected: RAS Extension Support
> | [    0.319950] BUG: scheduling while atomic: migration/3/36/0x00000002
> | [    0.319955] Modules linked in:
> | [    0.319958] Preemption disabled at:
> | [    0.319969] [<ffff000008181ae4>] cpu_stopper_thread+0x7c/0x108
> | [    0.319973] CPU: 3 PID: 36 Comm: migration/3 Not tainted 4.19.1-rt3-00250-g330fc2c2a880 #2
> | [    0.319975] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> | [    0.319976] Call trace:
> | [    0.319981]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x148
> | [    0.319983]  show_stack+0x14/0x20
> | [    0.319987]  dump_stack+0x80/0xa4
> | [    0.319989]  __schedule_bug+0x94/0xb0
> | [    0.319991]  __schedule+0x510/0x560
> | [    0.319992]  schedule+0x38/0xe8
> | [    0.319994]  rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked+0xf0/0x278
> | [    0.319996]  rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x5c/0x90
> | [    0.319998]  rt_spin_lock+0x54/0x58
> | [    0.320000]  enable_smccc_arch_workaround_1+0xdc/0x260
> | [    0.320001]  __enable_cpu_capability+0x10/0x20
> | [    0.320003]  multi_cpu_stop+0x84/0x108
> | [    0.320004]  cpu_stopper_thread+0x84/0x108
> | [    0.320008]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x1e8/0x2b0
> | [    0.320009]  kthread+0x124/0x128
> | [    0.320010]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> 
> Switch this to a raw spinlock, as we know this is only called with
> IRQs masked.

There might be a lock-free way to do this, but this isn't a fast-path
so I've queued up your patch for 4.21.

Thanks!

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-27 15:35 [PATCH] arm64: Use a raw spinlock in __install_bp_hardening_cb() James Morse
2018-11-27 19:15 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-11-28  7:51 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181127191521.GA5641@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).