From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:41:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 31/77] ARM: dts: sun6i: Change pinctrl nodes to avoid warning In-Reply-To: References: <288a28fa42f816b4f255a316569e7f750c3e73ac.1543321707.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20181128134129.rg3j4zgliwv4owpl@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 07:50:31PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 8:47 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > All our pinctrl nodes were using a node name convention with a unit-address > > to differentiate the different muxing options. However, since those nodes > > didn't have a reg property, they were generating warnings in DTC. > > > > In order to accomodate for this, convert the old nodes to the syntax we've > > been using for the new SoCs, including removing the letter suffix of the > > node labels to the bank of those pins to make things more readable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > [...] > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi > > index c5fd97b88b90..596ab854da2c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi > > [...] > > > @@ -712,12 +712,12 @@ > > bias-pull-up; > > }; > > > > - spdif_pins_a: spdif at 0 { > > + spdif_tx_pin: spdif-pin { > > Node name should be spdif-tx-pin, since this SoC also has > SPDIF input. > > Otherwise, > > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai I fixed it up while applying, thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: