From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:23:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 77/77] ARM: dts: sun9i: Add missing unit address In-Reply-To: References: <39e9a2c3caec8bf63469f65563361b39c85b607a.1543321707.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20181128142352.xsl5p7z4afl7gjs5@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:07:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 8:47 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > The soc node in the A80 DTSI has a ranges property, but no matching unit > > address, which results in a DTC warning. Add the unit address to remove > > that warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi > > index 27c2ad6bf002..ec504cea1b3e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi > > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > > > - soc { > > + soc at 20000 { > > Shouldn't it be 0? The BROM, though unlisted, is at 0x0. Hmm, I don't know what happened here, you're obviously right :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: