Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: core: link consumer with clock driver

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hello,

kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote on Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:29:05
+0800:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on clk/clk-next]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.20-rc4 next-20181130]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Miquel-Raynal/Add-device-links-to-clocks/20181201-074305
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next
> config: i386-randconfig-x071-201847 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=i386 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> drivers//clk/clkdev.c:115:13: error: static declaration of 'clk_link_consumer' follows non-static declaration  
>     static void clk_link_consumer(struct device *consumer, struct clk *clk) {}
>                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from drivers//clk/clkdev.c:22:0:
>    include/linux/clk-provider.h:784:6: note: previous declaration of 'clk_link_consumer' was here
>     void clk_link_consumer(struct device *consumer, struct clk *clk);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> drivers//clk/clkdev.c:116:13: error: static declaration of 'clk_unlink_consumer' follows non-static declaration  
>     static void clk_unlink_consumer(struct clk *clk) {}
>                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from drivers//clk/clkdev.c:22:0:
>    include/linux/clk-provider.h:785:6: note: previous declaration of 'clk_unlink_consumer' was here
>     void clk_unlink_consumer(struct clk *clk);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> vim +/clk_link_consumer +115 drivers//clk/clkdev.c
> 
>    114	
>  > 115	static void clk_link_consumer(struct device *consumer, struct clk *clk) {}
>  > 116	static void clk_unlink_consumer(struct clk *clk) {}  
>    117	
> 

Both functions should not be static. I will remove the keyword in a v3.


Thanks,
Miquèl

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel