From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37514C67839 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F22392086D for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sEI2OOdg"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="syBJRFhf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F22392086D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=OMh5zvyOKaVlGFX9sfya65lmi+znp6R1/qOQwBW6pOg=; b=sEI2OOdgvXMxlM 8LjJKJINbIxNx/2WtyxhXk7FhQV+MlGDbEuaJ1voTC1ygV6auK0bITJqjMrRu9YfZ98SUEfUN+tjd 8DKAICAaKRzpJbLUL0Z77CD9gHiNEDyC1AZryx6Owzr3LpT3JXQ4bCRFih5Ub3AA/XQ1xjlC9dAEq kcvmOkT3PYHZoW1t2fO58JSmxx/Bx1f/nYoVw4jKXwtRo8qKhQoreHmCchLmHJtYMqoCDWoEseu7M ZabvKAKdPp5AeSDIsXLbn14u7aEkbUQRXYz9Y4P5j4nB1JycJ9DnLL2H6EAG7elPVA1TeIvpDBJqG Smi4un8LL3ZDy/BzViSA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gXc2g-00081X-3m; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:13:26 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gXc2c-00080j-Lf for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:13:24 +0000 Received: from dragon (61-216-91-114.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.216.91.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B876A2086D; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:13:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544749992; bh=kWN4p+VyR38OOySBnD3pOw0g5JOZk1nwfMiBgOWd6w4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=syBJRFhf29yt6g88NnAumeFUqsGsJpnxduVywB5JZr7K92Qrs5Hj/rsyejPEQrY8F 66FC8ToVka+Ye9G3gyRySmqgFtWEiRidiRYPxbeqv2DXX2Z5A4DUH/IB+xBCg//EG3 RqhWy99glvoyXlCWPtgebjH8s3UDeTmhtkCqCbaA= Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:12:09 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Abel Vesa , Lucas Stach Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Remove CONFIG_SOC_IMX8MQ and use ARCH_MXC instead Message-ID: <20181214011207.GB13243@dragon> References: <1544707047-4417-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> <1544707047-4417-2-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> <1544711727.3137.32.camel@pengutronix.de> <20181213145149.6hyyhi6hxdzvikl4@fsr-ub1664-175> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181213145149.6hyyhi6hxdzvikl4@fsr-ub1664-175> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181213_171322_728565_31BBFEAB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Aisheng Dong , Rob Herring , Stephen Boyd , Will Deacon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fabio Estevam , dl-linux-imx , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Olof Johansson , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:51:50PM +0000, Abel Vesa wrote: ... > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > > > b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > > > index 7e1545a..318dbb9 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > > > @@ -148,14 +148,6 @@ config ARCH_MXC > > > =A0 =A0=A0This enables support for the ARMv8 based SoCs in the > > > =A0 =A0=A0NXP i.MX family. > > > =A0 > > > -config SOC_IMX8MQ > > > - bool "i.MX8MQ support" > > > - depends on ARCH_MXC > > > - select ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 > > > - select ARM64_ERRATUM_845719 > > > - help > > > - =A0=A0This enables support for the i.MX8MQ SoC. > > > - > > = > > NACK on this one. Having a single place where stuff that is absolutely > > critical for proper SoC operation can be selected is very useful and > > avoids hard to debug issues due to slightly wrong configs in the long > > run. > = > As mentioned in the cover letter, please ignore this patch set entirely. > The ARCH_MXC is actually used on arm32 too, so it won't work. > = > I'm working on a patchset that will add the Kconfig into = > drivers/clk/imx/ and in it will add CLK_IMX8MQ. That will > fix the clock dependency since the CLK_IMX8MQ will depend on > ARCH_MXC and ARM64. I believe the CLK_IMX8QXP will follow > the same pattern. > = > As for the SOC_IMX8MQ, all the other vendors have one single > config for all the arm64 platforms. TBH, to control every SoC > independently it's a little bit of an overkill. Lucas, We are still waiting for further comments from Olof [1]. But it sounds like SoC specific option is not welcomed on ARM64. Shawn [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10727453/#22378669 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel