[WRONG] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: fix off-by-one bug in vgic_get_irq()

[WRONG] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: fix off-by-one bug in vgic_get_irq()

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Hi Marc,

This is wrong: commit 6022fcc0e87a0eb5e9a72b15ed70dd29ebcb7343

The above is not my original patch and it should not be tagged for stable,
as it introduces the same kind of bug I intended to fix:

array_index_nospec() can now return kvm->arch.vgic.nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS
and this is not what you want. So, in this case the following line of code
is just fine as it is:

intid = array_index_nospec(intid, kvm->arch.vgic.nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); 


As the commit log says, my patch fixes:

commit 41b87599c74300027f305d7b34368ec558978ff2

not both:

commit 41b87599c74300027f305d7b34368ec558978ff2

and 

commit bea2ef803ade3359026d5d357348842bca9edcf1

If you want to apply the fix on top of bea2ef803ade3359026d5d357348842bca9edcf1
then you should apply this instead:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index bb1a83345741..e607547c7bb0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
        /* SGIs and PPIs */
        if (intid <= VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE) {
-               intid = array_index_nospec(intid, VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE);
+               intid = array_index_nospec(intid, VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE + 1);
                return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.private_irqs[intid];
        }
 

The commit log should remain the same.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [WRONG] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: fix off-by-one bug in vgic_get_irq()

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Gustavo,

On 19/12/2018 15:11, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> This is wrong: commit 6022fcc0e87a0eb5e9a72b15ed70dd29ebcb7343
> 
> The above is not my original patch and it should not be tagged for stable,
> as it introduces the same kind of bug I intended to fix:
> 
> array_index_nospec() can now return kvm->arch.vgic.nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS
> and this is not what you want. So, in this case the following line of code
> is just fine as it is:
> 
> intid = array_index_nospec(intid, kvm->arch.vgic.nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); 
> 
> 
> As the commit log says, my patch fixes:
> 
> commit 41b87599c74300027f305d7b34368ec558978ff2
> 
> not both:
> 
> commit 41b87599c74300027f305d7b34368ec558978ff2
> 
> and 
> 
> commit bea2ef803ade3359026d5d357348842bca9edcf1
> 
> If you want to apply the fix on top of bea2ef803ade3359026d5d357348842bca9edcf1
> then you should apply this instead:
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index bb1a83345741..e607547c7bb0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  {
>         /* SGIs and PPIs */
>         if (intid <= VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE) {
> -               intid = array_index_nospec(intid, VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE);
> +               intid = array_index_nospec(intid, VGIC_MAX_PRIVATE + 1);
>                 return &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.private_irqs[intid];
>         }
>  
> 
> The commit log should remain the same.

I indeed completely fscked up the conflict resolution, clearly not
engaging my brain. I'll fix that quickly.

Thanks for the heads up.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel