From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E949C43387 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626DD21019 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="dEKEOvcO"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="RbVYSLV2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 626DD21019 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gpqb6x1u9RCaL3/jLjJ9vqbgWT1L5B5MVhg/OaAJE+o=; b=dEKEOvcOnSK5gj V4FO9pab1r3oZNEImCvnic3w3RKo2jo9XMmSr5/W0THi4jo+SPacrObURihweJqRmT2o8EYKxmEbM NhU2jA2s+RkvRNVHjp+QJ/vMsPc/xLajnSzET7+FnztE26VzwqZ4T/+3UCGeoNdzzyeGVE0faEVpA Al+ZN35PZwBX0cp9dFh6DhIzu7TEAfjudRIkyH0R/dlUkQKqy/56UWoUJA5aZe4kkitiX4OGW3y30 t18qP9MHQ642JXh8572/dq2IHFtXR48J7QgPyAhrV4KRj3S4A0yrK8RQi+S8FK996XT5YaQ1ou9w+ RipWh7UP4oadg8B2u9cw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gd77y-0003Az-AD; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:38 +0000 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gd77v-0003AZ-CB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:36 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBT5P1wM077495; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=/jOzbgmOwXsm+ImaDFXsdQvBJxXZOL86F6amz7mxEww=; b=RbVYSLV2B1kTaM0yuDQ44gDrE7DUq+zFW/ZJM+cgJl2R2Hye5+1PjIDfriujjY2wzPOO MCDuso5/VMbbaa3pCR98aGSqqaAGuDT6hSeA9j8NtcP579C6ILhTiow6sJeU1+T8LKY4 CLDItmHUMgJzu9mWcwbRkn7Dpj3UIL0cwgGzKAYlfUZzCubVuQTY3UyAGkXQ50ALsA3M 0jyZth1BJYbQxHH9pC3KDuhUTXPUlR4QNiwEqUzgZ2uvy2xiseGlp+vSXUhob/uUA2Qp m5i4sINRz8Z42jF1XWOJWynzwhDO0Kdf0XG+L+rDqiWDslEtYNZcaR9zNwHZpZ08qie8 bw== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2pnxedr9m1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:13 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBT5P7r0015570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:08 GMT Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBT5P5B5003002; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:05 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:25:05 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:25:04 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Message-ID: <20181229052504.GA16315@magnolia> References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9120 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=623 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812290048 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181228_212535_537387_95DAE3C7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.44 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , Tom Psyborg , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel