From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: pihsun@chromium.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: compat: Don't pull syscall number from regs in arm_compat_syscall
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 12:37:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104123706.GA3571@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546539240-20647-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 06:13:59PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> The syscall number may have been changed by a tracer, so we should pass
> the actual number in from the caller instead of pulling it from the
> saved r7 value directly.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
I was confused by the history here: commit 4141c857fd09 ("arm64: convert
raw syscall invocation to C") breaks syscall changing via
discarding the return from syscall_trace_enter() (which would also break
this case for compat), but the subsequent patch that migrates the
syscall code to C appears to fix it again.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Cc: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c | 9 ++++-----
> arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 9 ++++-----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
> index 5972b7533fa0..54c29cd38ff9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c
> @@ -66,12 +66,11 @@ do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flags)
> /*
> * Handle all unrecognised system calls.
> */
> -long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno)
> {
> - unsigned int no = regs->regs[7];
> void __user *addr;
>
> - switch (no) {
> + switch (scno) {
> /*
> * Flush a region from virtual address 'r0' to virtual address 'r1'
> * _exclusive_. There is no alignment requirement on either address;
> @@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * way the calling program can gracefully determine whether
> * a feature is supported.
> */
> - if (no < __ARM_NR_compat_syscall_end)
> + if (scno < __ARM_NR_compat_syscall_end)
> return -ENOSYS;
> break;
> }
> @@ -116,6 +115,6 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 4);
>
> arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad compat syscall(2)", regs,
> - SIGILL, ILL_ILLTRP, addr, no);
> + SIGILL, ILL_ILLTRP, addr, scno);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
> index 032d22312881..5610ac01c1ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -13,16 +13,15 @@
> #include <asm/thread_info.h>
> #include <asm/unistd.h>
>
> -long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -
> +long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno);
> long sys_ni_syscall(void);
>
> -asmlinkage long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> long ret;
> if (is_compat_task()) {
> - ret = compat_arm_syscall(regs);
> + ret = compat_arm_syscall(regs, scno);
> if (ret != -ENOSYS)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ static void invoke_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int scno,
> syscall_fn = syscall_table[array_index_nospec(scno, sc_nr)];
> ret = __invoke_syscall(regs, syscall_fn);
> } else {
> - ret = do_ni_syscall(regs);
> + ret = do_ni_syscall(regs, scno);
> }
>
> regs->regs[0] = ret;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-03 18:13 [PATCH 0/3] Fix private compat syscall emulation Will Deacon
2019-01-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: compat: Avoid sending SIGILL for unallocated syscall numbers Will Deacon
2019-01-04 4:50 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-04 12:54 ` Dave Martin
2019-01-04 13:47 ` Will Deacon
2019-01-04 14:15 ` Dave Martin
2019-01-03 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: compat: Don't pull syscall number from regs in arm_compat_syscall Will Deacon
2019-01-04 4:50 ` Sasha Levin
2019-01-04 12:37 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-01-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: compat: Hook up io_pgetevents() for 32-bit tasks Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190104123706.GA3571@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pihsun@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).