From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D03C43387 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 00:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76BC206B7 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 00:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="YbvwDsnD"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="k2791II8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A76BC206B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gd9eyfuTpV6TrXS9GOeKpHXhVLbOrs5ergR9a/5sEx8=; b=YbvwDsnDA0vBbA HTtZFw2pSrIRNm8rntLxkrG2qjUx2pS1PhvAFZBA36tiTnL+myy7xELhgYDqJAHjEhw8PCJsQ3Ivf fQtNPPH3QyHclcscNzHvlaZ/hwYqiB+0/UX028GudeRzge101jEeEAYha/btS9tIZCWqlZZ4Kqtff f93m0Jfx1WTZFLeE4cYD7O+r40JwABXSsBQBuEiXEcF4Tm4UzYeOZSh/JJt+1DzSUv03cXHJjl/vj LhUgUMLdC5yPbIlaNR/Q25oD/O294JhNm+J/p9DHGZTUqv55Rzf7cP/FMZgHf6TF+2o12li7gC3Bm rxfPYvI6do5creyZmd+A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ggfX5-0008PX-Eg; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:46:15 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ggfX1-0008Ob-Er for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:46:13 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id w6so907622pgl.6 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 16:46:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Snvh6Ow7n3uk2POMbNVXitzrCaFvEq04lk3zzwRJXcM=; b=k2791II8ShxWskzTaqJFueGmHUnsV3hTJ9t40Qse9ilQTsVofbhtEJ94ddNVe9+LpV rtGE3goxE6psxRjGldEhbjdas2sfdqjBmfrOz9WK97Zbgp8N9IE6sI436s/spRDvMUs7 jTLFRa4fBUJDqvhS2bMj+Qo+VRhAxc5TEOZCXUNb+34gGIEogLGs2xiOaEy4piYyM0dX dS5hiJ+qH7xH4q3QIZ5DvIfDUZjTPDvXVIs37Ryvx+aYUhejLIa7eI0lPlEqXiYebyYp FWKUFzQAlf9jeupGHGaLZRrZFpe5r2gACvZ8f0JpbC5GySJD7t685Nsr0sRSHhmRkOSf 0E3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Snvh6Ow7n3uk2POMbNVXitzrCaFvEq04lk3zzwRJXcM=; b=diDTv5+KqUjlXGA41oFgt6MzqXxVUGITtI4P6Ps0SzTwfsuwwJn0EjKlc0uYL+r3IJ VKIt76zYTZIdR/OLDCqDAMh+ZOGhMGTI7BJUGBIFWMFcOrxdV0J3M9jB78duQGy7VxJc RQc/BKYyTHabEMvMK13fFK9dPVOtHyGTfP34gHK1RUQGnaGKI6cjd5ccpqEf3gyj/ZDT 0RpavAHBPee0/7OtVdfw6EZPtZ7bacYUscHIeow6zFzNTHfANtCeblbivM82VLTJZvnQ +BBsLC4eSiQ7XfqXHzp0kobnPXDDXYuSaQspcR7p0qnaa/1E72iPuD9H4PDnoiU7OjcG bwNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdKAMCpwNyl5mtWE7FeiKGq/BIUz+HDu9f3NGNB4SiQcJEdu6Lc eivUgN3XRlaXdgtPmymnylY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7FwyZJ+F8saacMoC6xj3PEZJIeLQtbbJHC4h+w/z0VHqR6O8Rn+Ysbbg76HUWDrLX+w9rF/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:db48:: with SMTP id x8mr12397898pgi.365.1546908368876; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 16:46:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from icarus ([2001:268:c0a3:b52b:e409:8f0c:a3eb:73df]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v190sm97819675pfv.26.2019.01.07.16.46.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jan 2019 16:46:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:46:32 +0900 From: William Breathitt Gray To: Patrick Havelange , Jonathan Cameron , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: New IIO/counter driver Message-ID: <20190108004632.GA3247@icarus> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190107_164611_502079_58BB5098 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, benjamin.gaignard@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, knaack.h@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, fabrice.gasnier@st.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Patrick Havelange wrote: > Hello, > > I'm in the process of adding a new IIO/counter driver, however I also saw > that there was a work in progress to have a separate counter subsystem ( > https://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=153974167727206 ). But it seems there is > no recent progress on it. > What is the state of those patches ? Is it still interesting to develop the > driver as an IIO/counter , or should I use already that new subsystem ? > > Best Regards, > > Patrick Havelange. Hello, I am still open to merging this patchset and maintaining the Counter subsystem. However, I took the lack of response for my latest submission to indicate a loss of interest in this patchset's approach. If there are still people who want this, I can rebase and resend this patchset for submission; the past few versions have primarily been code clarity and documentation changes so I believe the core design itself is somewhat stable now. Just let me know how best to proceed and I shall be happy to oblige -- whether to continue maintaining this patchset or to drop this design in favor of improving the existing IIO Counter code in the kernel. I'll CC those from the patchset submission to keep them in the loop. Sincerely, William Breathitt Gray _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel