From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: kvm: describe data or unified caches as having 1 set and 1 way
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:14:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190108111444.GM10769@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu94dRFbjqckGG-oedsM=ET-wpkZtUo7-hPbVqeUELwffw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:11:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 12:02, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 04:02:05PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On SMP ARM systems, cache maintenance by set/way should only ever be
> > > done in the context of onlining or offlining CPUs, which is typically
> > > done by bare metal firmware and never in a virtual machine. For this
> > > reason, we trap set/way cache maintenance operations and replace them
> > > with conditional flushing of the entire guest address space.
> > >
> > > Due to this trapping, the set/way arguments passed into the set/way
> > > ops are completely ignored, and thus irrelevant. This also means that
> > > the set/way geometry is equally irrelevant, and we can simply report
> > > it as 1 set and 1 way, so that legacy 32-bit ARM system software (i.e.,
> > > the kind that only receives odd fixes) doesn't take a performance hit
> > > due to the trapping when iterating over the cachelines.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > index 464e794b5bc5..eb244ff98dca 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > @@ -1180,6 +1180,21 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > >
> > > csselr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, CSSELR_EL1);
> > > p->regval = get_ccsidr(csselr);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Guests should not be doing cache operations by set/way at all, and
> > > + * for this reason, we trap them and attempt to infer the intent, so
> > > + * that we can flush the entire guest's address space at the appropriate
> > > + * time.
> > > + * To prevent this trapping from causing performance problems, let's
> > > + * expose the geometry of all data and unified caches (which are
> > > + * guaranteed to be PIPT and thus non-aliasing) as 1 set and 1 way.
> > > + * [If guests should attempt to infer aliasing properties from the
> > > + * geometry (which is not permitted by the architecture), they would
> > > + * only do so for virtually indexed caches.]
> > > + */
> > > + if (!(csselr & 1)) // data or unified cache
> > > + p->regval &= ~GENMASK(27, 2);
> >
> > Why are you clearing the upper bit the LineSize field?
> >
>
> Ah, that needs to be ~GENMASK(27,3), of course.
With that fixed, the patches look fine to me.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-08 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-17 15:02 [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm64: kvm: cache ID register trapping Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-17 15:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: kvm: expose sanitised cache type register to guest Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-31 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-31 11:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-31 11:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-31 11:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-17 15:02 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: kvm: describe data or unified caches as having 1 set and 1 way Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-08 11:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2019-01-08 11:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-08 11:14 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190108111444.GM10769@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com \
--to=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).