From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: trap illegal translations in __virt_to_phys()
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:14:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190108121440.GC29102@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546917883.6754.8.camel@mtkswgap22>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:24:43AM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 15:00 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:21:20PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> > > Current __virt_to_phys() only print warning messages for non-linear
> > > addresses. It's hard to catch all warnings by those messages.
> >
> > Why? Are you seeing a large number of warnings somewhere?
>
> Official kernel works fine. I saw some cases in our internal branch and
> we're fixing them.
>
> >
> > > So add a VIRTUAL_BUG_ON() to trap all non-linear and non-symbol
> > > addresses (e.g., stack addresses)
> > >
> > > Tested by pass stack addresses and symbol addresses to __pa(). Result:
> > > stack addresses: kernel BUG()
> >
> > Either:
> >
> > * Stacks are vmap'd, and __is_lm_address(stack_addr) is false. We'll
> > produce a WARNING() today (and return a junk physical address).
> >
> > * Stacks are linear mapped, and cannot be distinguished from other
> > linear mapped addresses. The physical address will be valid.
> >
> > ... so I don't understand why you need to change this.
>
> For the first case: for vmap'd stack, __pa() returns a junk
> physical address and it might be easier to debug this incorrect address
> translation by a BUG() call instead of monitoring the warning log.
I think that's an argument for upgrading the existing WARN() to a BUG(),
rather than adding a separate VIRTUAL_BUG_ON().
However, there are cases where the junk physical address is not used to
perform an access, and the WARN() is more helpful.
You can set panic_on_warn to get an immediate panic() when the WARN()
fires. Is there some reason that approach doesn't work for you?
Thanks,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-08 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 11:21 [PATCH] arm64: trap illegal translations in __virt_to_phys() Miles Chen
2019-01-07 15:00 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-08 3:24 ` Miles Chen
2019-01-08 12:14 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-01-09 1:35 ` Miles Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190108121440.GC29102@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox