From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAC1C43387 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04BB20874 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WNNb3z7v"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="kyIxLNtq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D04BB20874 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=C0UJVY+N4V1EChVVXo7k+g6kJtw/glDk7oTsNs1CcIE=; b=WNNb3z7v9/I0YG W9UnSXdTBK8RSdp4ekj0Wkb4Yk/qaof3jwmkN2alxgOF9lGhoFQm9S10TdHKQ4YDWg2twIn68g8A9 n8zsuewA1xkkcWu6xqfDUHJSAZsgPSea2Sy1KwadkvQqQKc41h8dF4dWttmtLPlzgybR8o5J26qeA rZDB0Iz3jlpDR8rw0vxuHNLANtMZYl2R0ReAFrGKliChfwFme/p0Eb316Cj5Mr4OQNU7URx3M7pN1 vAJJjsjFaVsyd3Pyow7WeV9kADg4Q8JbsWCcVjY/ymxr2H3PQtiFHMzp4Rt1uKTr6ZowXQKWsIfnH HbR4o0JqFlISZmraRa/w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghyRV-0001ct-NR; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:53 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghyRS-0001bP-5b for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2014; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2KOgFTAdL+5OBjxO+GVsXq8NbLH+CmWRoJ566I1E2lA=; b=kyIxLNtqCFfUCWtxVwAlsXaHg E/vLnSMwphWhq/+3ima1aE68HLLKCG6BrRtfdQG1Li10ouvN02ZkXtE5lu1NUs8ROMcPE4QGyQwZa KH0134jE+jltSrnCfWtQFR4ZgZeAAxPQtaHEa5ndZF/Hk79GwpFQ+ixeulUlI0EfT6AxM=; Received: from n2100.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:51183) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ghyRH-0005j0-IK; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:39 +0000 Received: from linux by n2100.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ghyRE-0003Cf-Iq; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:36 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:09:35 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: qcom: remove unnecessary boot_lock Message-ID: <20190111150935.GA4617@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20181213175952.GC26090@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190111_070950_368224_10DA0993 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-oxnas@groups.io, Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano , Stephen Boyd , David Brown , Andy Gross , Linux-OMAP , "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:50:56PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:00 PM Russell King wrote: > > > The boot_lock is something that was required for ARM development > > platforms to ensure that the delay calibration worked properly. This > > is not necessary for modern platforms that have better bus bandwidth > > and do not need to calibrate the delay loop for secondary cores. > > Remove the boot_lock entirely. > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > Andy have you had a chance to test/apply this patch? I would rather folk do not _apply_ these patches - the final patch is dependent on all the preceeding patches, and if they're applied to individual trees, it will mean that the final patch has to be delayed by a complete kernel development cycle to avoid bisect breakage. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel