From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966D0C43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D7E20855 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sw192WlN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64D7E20855 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=sfDXfRiWbgcvQjknkBbkLAAauSPkaOY9FB/Wk6XMtXA=; b=sw192WlNN3hgK5 qb7+J+6NtWo7R97VlynZjUC2Hju5d+5gWXL2odgEJjdb+urioGuzysDcsTAzQUEx3mWqQlpB7WV+e yAN6veYnrB7ucMoSJAxZZyRTKHaGXkjqPTYl+gWkKhQZsDyw09+R1ZuLVPV4uN+JazUXTRe7g9C4n sNSY/YjeHXK77hvUAie6trwfy2XrMaPNd2JCOI3MGEn/N3d8G86j1o87VQoGNBiV1YLNNDh32LQog WTaKBipKe/DPt7jrQzibK20Il07mYQyuq0ryGJGCCBlWECR960YZ84jCH99i/iZt/OMWKXFXymE96 0q7JwfDB1j2ohkjk2x0g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gk9uA-0002T9-SU; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:48:30 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211] helo=newverein.lst.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gk9u7-0002SN-Uy for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:48:29 +0000 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2005) id EAFF368CEB; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100 From: Torsten Duwe To: Julien Thierry Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Message-ID: <20190117154821.GC9094@lst.de> References: <20190104141053.360F768D93@newverein.lst.de> <8eb70db4-92a2-95a2-075c-f26690aab3ed@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8eb70db4-92a2-95a2-075c-f26690aab3ed@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190117_074828_146494_7C4ADFB8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , AKASHI Takahiro , Ingo Molnar , Josh Poimboeuf , Amit Daniel Kachhap , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:57:39AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote: > > I wanted to test this patch (and try to benchmark having the "mov x9, > x30" always present in function prelude vs having two nops), but I > cannot get this patch to apply (despite having a version including both > commits below). > > Could you provide a git branch from which I could try to rebase the > patch? (Or a new version of the series) It also applies with just a single, harmless fuzz 1 onto 5.0-rc2. Does that help? I'm currently over v7, with Mark's requests included and the mov patching done only once at bootup... Torsten _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel