[PATCH v3 30/30] ARM: sun8i: a83t: full range OPP tables and CPUfreq

Maxime Ripard
2018-09-06T11:42:41Z

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:39:43PM +0200, Philipp Rossak wrote:
> On 06.09.2018 09:24, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > Hi Philipp,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 05:45:18PM +0200, Philipp Rossak wrote:
> > > Since we have now thermal trotteling enabeled we can now add the full
> > > range of the OPP table.
> > >
> > That's not the reason why they were not added.
> >
> > Please see commit 2db639d8c1663d7543c9ab5323383d94c8a76c63[1].
> >
> > Basically, you only want the OPPs which can work below or at the default
> > voltage of the CPU supply, because the CPU supply is specific to each
> > board.
> >
> > If you set your CPU to work at a given frequency and the voltage isn't
> > updated (saying opp-microvolt = <x>; in DT isn't enough, you need
> > cpu-supply to be provided and functional), the CPU might just crash.
> >
> > Without cpu-supply property, underclocking isn't effective in term of
> > thermal cooling or power saving. Overclocking is very, very, very likely
> > to make the CPU crash.
> >
> > It's not a very difficult thing to do to test if a given frequency work
> > well but it needs a specific test environment and it's a lengthy test,
> > you can have a look at those tools here[3] if you like. It's not because
> > it works in a given test case that'll work on the long term under heavy
> > load and constant frequency changes.
> >
> > For A83T, I already did it and the outcome is the patch in [1]. Same for
> > A33.
> >
> > So, if you want to use these three higher OPPs, you need to define them
> > in your board DTS and add the cpu-supply property. See what's done for
> > the A33 and more specifically the Sinlinx SinA33[2] as an example.
> >
> > [1]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2db639d8c1663d7543c9ab5323383d94c8a76c63
> > [2]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33-sinlinx-sina33.dts
> > [3]http://linux-sunxi.org/Hardware_Reliability_Tests#CPU
> >
> > Quentin
> >
>
> Hey Quentin,
>
> thanks for your feedback!
>
> Sounds like we will never be able to run the A83T on its maximum frequency
> in mainline.
>
> I will do some testing, during the next weeks/months when I have time.
> With the old Allwinner kernel I was able to run the A83T with its maximum
> frequency without any problems since my board is very good cooled.

You definitely can, but I think Quentin's point was to do it on a
per-board basis, not for all of the A83t boards at once.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180906/d404cf66/attachment.sig>