From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/27] mtd: nand: Introduce the ECC engine abstraction
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:16:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221121625.33a7f6c0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190221100216.25255-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:01:52 +0100
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> index 30f0fb02abe2..9e3b018d0b83 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> @@ -82,8 +82,14 @@ struct nand_pos {
> unsigned int page;
> };
>
> +enum nand_page_io_req_type {
> + NAND_PAGE_READ = 0,
> + NAND_PAGE_WRITE,
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct nand_page_io_req - NAND I/O request object
> + * @type: the type of page I/O: read or write
> * @pos: the position this I/O request is targeting
> * @dataoffs: the offset within the page
> * @datalen: number of data bytes to read from/write to this page
> @@ -99,6 +105,7 @@ struct nand_pos {
> * specific commands/operations.
> */
> struct nand_page_io_req {
> + enum nand_page_io_req_type type;
Can you add the reqtype enum and type field (+ patch the iterator
helpers) in a separate patch?
> struct nand_pos pos;
> unsigned int dataoffs;
> unsigned int datalen;
> @@ -116,13 +123,35 @@ struct nand_page_io_req {
> };
>
> /**
> - * struct nand_ecc_req - NAND ECC requirements
> + * struct nand_ecc_conf - NAND ECC configuration
> + * @strength: ECC strength
> + * @step_size: Number of bytes per step
> + * @total: Total number of bytes used for storing ECC codes, this is used by
> + * generic OOB layouts
> + */
> +struct nand_ecc_conf {
Please do the s/nand_ecc_req/nand_ecc_conf/ in a separate patch.
> + unsigned int strength;
> + unsigned int step_size;
> + unsigned int total;
Do we really need to add this total field here? Looks like something
that should be kept private to the ECC engine implementation.
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct nand_ecc_user_conf - User desired ECC configuration
> + * @mode: ECC mode
> + * @algo: ECC algorithm
> * @strength: ECC strength
> * @step_size: ECC step/block size
> + * @maximize: ECC parameters must be maximized depending on the device
> + * capabilities
> + * @flags: User flags
> */
> -struct nand_ecc_req {
> +struct nand_ecc_user_conf {
> + int mode;
We should definitely name that one differently ('provider' maybe).
> + unsigned int algo;
> unsigned int strength;
> unsigned int step_size;
> + unsigned int maximize;
> + unsigned int flags;
maximize could be a flag.
> };
>
> #define NAND_ECCREQ(str, stp) { .strength = (str), .step_size = (stp) }
> @@ -157,11 +186,76 @@ struct nand_ops {
> bool (*isbad)(struct nand_device *nand, const struct nand_pos *pos);
> };
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-21 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-21 10:01 [RFC PATCH 00/27] Introduce the generic ECC engine abstraction Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 01/27] mtd: nand: Move nand_device forward declaration to the top Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 02/27] mtd: nand: Compile in the NAND core by default Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 11:06 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 11:14 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 11:46 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:08 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:52 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 03/27] mtd: nand: Introduce the ECC engine abstraction Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 11:16 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-02-27 9:26 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-27 9:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-25 18:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-27 13:56 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-27 14:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-27 14:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-27 14:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-27 14:34 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 04/27] mtd: Fix typo in mtd_ooblayout_set_databytes() description Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 05/27] mtd: nand: Move standard OOB layouts to the NAND core Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 11:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 11:47 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:10 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 06/27] mtd: nand: Move ECC specific functions to ecc/engine.c Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 07/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Move BCH code into the ecc/ directory Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 08/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Use SPDX license identifier for the software BCH code Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 11:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 11:48 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 09/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Turn the software BCH implementation generic Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 12:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 12:53 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:01 ` [RFC PATCH 10/27] mtd: rawnand: Get rid of chip->ecc.priv Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 13:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-02-21 10:02 ` [RFC PATCH 11/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Move Hamming code into the ecc/ directory Miquel Raynal
2019-02-21 10:02 ` [RFC PATCH 12/27] mtd: nand: ecc: Use SPDX license identifier for the software Hamming code Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190221121625.33a7f6c0@kernel.org \
--to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
--cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).