From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F0FC43381 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9567620449 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LiZIkCEx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9567620449 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZjmcHHTUDpJZ9rFtVYC1QjarYjNaOjAz2ckTw2yKKVI=; b=LiZIkCExJ/KkOS cAV55Xpmqx/ciAVpdQHuG5o2v6ehbi5LPDsh1jXKFQOvgy7c9JxCoj0O+WFiMVjh2wsoTiOsPpjBZ VK5BwFZ9+o1QOXnXsb1ZLmV5QikFCsGtwDvPGhD8YaifvUYOJ3QxJPhJbEFuq3QVPhgt+39V2yoM4 pvnsGoyWCmc1hej/GAP8FCre9A097vS0qMR4ZKREAnmHJy5lblCSy/ohrCn1dKYOkHt8nqEEJsu42 2A4fIaZvDChjnS5Zxlq11Et19RJUNtJEtD69IiECXMLyOlJNmZj2z6A2n8W8REc5CCT17W7n7T9an j1hynD/Y1kkceaV9GwZg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h4Nxw-0008Is-0I; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:52:00 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h4Nxs-0008Hl-L2 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:51:57 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4586780D; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 03:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 514E83F71D; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 03:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:51:44 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Message-ID: <20190314105143.GA15410@e107155-lin> References: <20190228183220.15626-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190228183220.15626-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190304101205.GA1504@e107155-lin> <96d59a68-e5e2-86d9-c707-a79aad438b76@arm.com> <20190311183403.GA31062@e107155-lin> <65b00ea1-f784-4fb4-2a98-49fa44d9fa8f@arm.com> <20190312120944.GB13825@e107155-lin> <5750cfac-14a7-8eed-09f4-0d53419bea6b@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5750cfac-14a7-8eed-09f4-0d53419bea6b@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190314_035156_696396_4D79E2D6 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.69 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , "jdike@addtoit.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , Richard Weinberger , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Andy Lutomirski , Michael Ellerman , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , "Bin Lu \(Arm Technology China\)" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:03:18AM +0000, Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) wrote: [...] > Since ptrace() system call do have so many request type, I'm not sure > whether the test cases have covered all of that. But here we'd better make > sure the PTRACE_SYSEMU and PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP requests are work > correctly. May be you can verify them with tests from Bin Lu(bin.lu@arm.com). Sure happy to try them. Can you point me to them ? I did end up writing few more tests. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel