From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF82C43381 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BFB82070D for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="J0mv5CfV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3BFB82070D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mo3ZYKpd3/IGsH+EaNoaNMk1qykfuXDugwwLzwWgzuc=; b=J0mv5CfVxQdKxk OrGMLKNv+Y3in2C469G+JzNS6jAXbpkLQJIGj4pWQ8shIn/jsJTCkx8/4IvmZ7OAsZqa6fuAQYAuT aErmnsJkFs+vIJ3vRAc6gVaadIl8FAcce8DXpv6wPj+w2Dgj9GbNE0iU2pgvoTJWiXI9aHnsA/+WF EDfOIZ7TvljkiYW85MwxxCbItz7rHGaN/LmKk0aFGzA2RhFToXYLxrkMiF7gV99z5wgL0P4CGJ/L7 3HoPl/0UsdcFoxgaY6JoYmJK6K0S3A6fQqA1L99IemH788LE135Tb+rzxKUU72pL/Zb2Hk7sKyHFs +dKl4L92ELCSNpn4epnw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h4R1O-000318-UI; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:07:46 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h4R1L-00030U-Gv; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:07:44 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E75EAB6D; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:07:37 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Attempt to address style issues in spi-mt7621.c Message-ID: <20190314150737.61eed622@endymion> In-Reply-To: <20190314112732.GJ2227@kadam> References: <20190313122403.248873-1-armax@google.com> <20190313123454.GB2202@kadam> <20190314111313.GB8034@google.com> <20190314112732.GJ2227@kadam> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190314_070743_705158_75A20E58 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neil@brown.name, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, sankalpnegi2310@gmail.com, Armando Miraglia , sr@denx.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Dan, On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:27:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Armando Miraglia wrote: > > Is there an explicit intent to deprecate Lindent in favor of checkpatch.pl > > --fix? If one would like to contribute to fixing the tooling for linting which > > of the two would be the right target for such an effort? > > I've added Jean to the CC list because he worked on Lindent a few > years ago. I really think we should just delete Lindent. I haven't > used the checkpatch.pl --fix option but Joe Perches has good style. I merely fixed obvious but minor issues in Lindent as I stumbled upon them the one time in my life I used that script. That was years ago. I'm not using it on a regular basis. My principle is that if a script is present in the kernel tree then it can and should be maintained. If it is deemed not worth the maintenance effort then it should be deleted. I don't care either way. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel