From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA47BC43381 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B55217F5 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="XSUbmdQP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 92B55217F5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=JsOu/9jMd/xgN5f22cqcJbsKZTyFca3FkmLvynCbiIE=; b=XSUbmdQPfpYJA3NY7KwHBzcdn eNDZ4YqoZ3m8I3upvNUGc0XDRYg3oHeJuxiyZfzwChRhTj6lqOYPOH7ZWXQQmOnkcIqhI6NiizDbX f4oDE/5R95gjD2vNtbBlXbJNdCqoMllktlmjJX+Om1hbt9SLpharkktAoBjmBSXQt1j56LfWmN811 pCSaynA0lGb47kd32iYeD52gqEzRE1mBe+tcbYfULqxwGrqbn8ldV41kLr75JNLcI6yqAwaYRopc0 qB7yYLAE4G3hDWYPn7F7kr8+6ufi0bo6JSLy3kvrzjSKUP7S+rXn3vG4Sfl19u5RlXYc6NBzLpaEk Pwg+X5j1w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h4ijP-0005OA-Ul; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:02:23 +0000 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h4ijM-0005J8-6i for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:02:21 +0000 X-Originating-IP: 90.88.22.102 Received: from localhost (aaubervilliers-681-1-80-102.w90-88.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.88.22.102]) (Authenticated sender: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A02A24000D; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 10:02:16 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: Chen-Yu Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: dts: sun9i: Add missing unit address Message-ID: <20190315090216.qypb7tfquk5bfwth@flea> References: <463dbc60de944f4e0400dcdc190c983cf0d208e8.1552594551.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190315_020220_392817_E9AFB7C6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sean Paul , Maarten Lankhorst , linux-arm-kernel , dri-devel Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7165846797682173511==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============7165846797682173511== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2zirji6ya3tnhg7a" Content-Disposition: inline --2zirji6ya3tnhg7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:39:24AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:16 AM Maxime Ripard = wrote: > > > > The soc node in the A80 DTSI has a ranges property, but no matching unit > > address, which results in a DTC warning. Add the unit address to remove > > that warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i= -a80.dtsi > > index 9b15f272e5f5..7a495c84ab65 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi > > @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ > > status =3D "disabled"; > > }; > > > > - soc { > > + soc@20000 { >=20 > I thought we didn't like the soc node having an address? In general, yes, but in general we also don't have a ranges property. > Maybe we just bite the bullet and use 64-bit addresses and sizes for > the A80? I'd rather not, the current layout of the DT is pretty nice. But now I'm thinking, do you remember why we need to do that mapping in the first place? It's a 32bits SoCs, so why do we need to care about 64 bits addresses? Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --2zirji6ya3tnhg7a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXItqGAAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xQgdAP9w+by0IvvOsMTlM72lSQLRmNXWlPHOgsk2zXENX+w7qwEAplIrEUTPvgts xHjMCiY9P7FK7wY5tuIKM2l/2UlcRA0= =vP3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2zirji6ya3tnhg7a-- --===============7165846797682173511== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============7165846797682173511==--