Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Steven Rostedt \(VMware\)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Philip Derrin <philip@cog.systems>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:05:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319210508.GD17966@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9b528f1-0c4b-3894-18e1-a4999c18f4a4@deltatee.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:50:25PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019-03-19 2:42 p.m., Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:13:57PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> Cleanup the arm_memory_present() function seeing it's very
> >> similar to other arches.
> >>
> >> The new memblocks_present() helper checks for node ids which the
> >> arm version did not. However, this is equivalent seeing
> >> HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP should be false in this arch and therefore
> >> memblock_get_region_node() should return 0.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> >> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> >> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> Cc: Philip Derrin <philip@cog.systems>
> >> Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Strangely, I've got a feeling I've already reviewed such patch from a
> > different person...
> 
> You're probably referring to [1] which was for arm64 and was redundant
> as my patch for that architecture was already picked up by Catalin.

I've found the patch [1] I mentioned, and it was for ARM.

> I was the person who originally introduced memblocks_present() and I'm
> still hoping to get the cleanup patches for the arm and sh arches to be
> picked up.

AFAIK, For ARM you'd need to put it into Russel's patch tracking system [2].

> Thanks,
> 
> Logan
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190210093738.30923-1-peng.fan@nxp.com/T/#u
> 

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190211131602.3294-1-peng.fan@nxp.com
[2] https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-19 18:13 [PATCH] ARM: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-19 20:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-03-19 20:50   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-03-19 21:05     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2019-03-19 21:12       ` Logan Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190319210508.GD17966@rapoport-lnx \
    --to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=philip@cog.systems \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox