public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jeremy.linton@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:56:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327105640.ibiw5mvuggp35msl@queper01-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552048728-29657-1-git-send-email-clingutla@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

On Friday 08 Mar 2019 at 18:08:48 (+0530), Lingutla Chandrasekhar wrote:
> If user updates any cpu's cpu_capacity, then the new value is going to
> be applied to all its online sibling cpus. But this need not to be correct
> always, as sibling cpus (in ARM, same micro architecture cpus) would have
> different cpu_capacity with different performance characteristics.
> So updating the user supplied cpu_capacity to all cpu siblings
> is not correct.
> 
> And another problem is, current code assumes that 'all cpus in a cluster
> or with same package_id (core_siblings), would have same cpu_capacity'.
> But with commit '5bdd2b3f0f8 ("arm64: topology: add support to remove
> cpu topology sibling masks")', when a cpu hotplugged out, the cpu
> information gets cleared in its sibling cpus. So user supplied
> cpu_capacity would be applied to only online sibling cpus at the time.
> After that, if any cpu hot plugged in, it would have different cpu_capacity
> than its siblings, which breaks the above assumption.
> 
> So instead of mucking around the core sibling mask for user supplied
> value, use device-tree to set cpu capacity. And make the cpu_capacity
> node as read-only to know the assymetry between cpus in the system.
> While at it, remove cpu_scale_mutex usage, which used for sysfs write
> protection.
> 
> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>

Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Tested-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>

Thanks for doing this,
Quentin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 11:53 [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-02-28 12:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 14:38   ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-02-28 15:25     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-02 13:30       ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-03-04 18:21         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05  9:23           ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 11:13             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 11:29               ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 11:36                 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 15:53                   ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-03-05 16:12                     ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 16:54                     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-06 15:22                       ` Morten Rasmussen
2019-03-06 15:27                         ` [PATCH v1] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-07  7:28                           ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07  9:31                             ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07  9:57                               ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 12:14                                 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 15:04                                   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:19                           ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-08 11:45                           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-03-08 12:38                             ` [PATCH v2] " Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-27 10:56                               ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2019-03-06  9:48                 ` [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster Dietmar Eggemann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-27 11:57 [PATCH v2] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-27 16:15 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-03-28  4:47 Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-28  6:56 ` Mukesh Ojha
2019-03-29 16:26 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190327105640.ibiw5mvuggp35msl@queper01-lin \
    --to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=clingutla@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox