From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A1C4360F for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3BD2075E for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="apAfxgMv" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5F3BD2075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1Htb7XH6Y9vCxGeBBBsXkqLSW2+alEnPVzvZFjvRXU4=; b=apAfxgMvV8u+8H XB6YvpDF36u1e2/HiwBkAByZKlYCU8TEutnHYXpQDBaaoR6zw434yVGLXbbSqVB3Rz4EWUzIowL+B 4kccgsEyL5GZuAKr4KP+Ya1Uzq3zucj86QQKPpD+Lako6bG0tX4dWGMBey1+pHftsfgoezvCM+Nxh /t3U+yW4vu0UMyzB56J5fOT2/TzdAkyHkfLfVxOCTpnzC/XddglwGBrBLBJ6Oh1tyU49OuCY/FzYW 1AAcGXvit5kXksKY3QS6/keenIXTk5mM5Lflii7ztClqKtYkM0LSanXZKlhKwCMR+1x07pDBQOQi8 4+18hlr8GHR1VMrPPsUA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h9t5t-0001N3-QL; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:06:57 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h9t5p-0001MF-Ud for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:06:55 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC7A78; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e103592.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AE133F557; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:06:44 +0000 From: Dave Martin To: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/27] KVM: arm64: SVE guest support Message-ID: <20190329150642.GD3567@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1553864452-15080-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190329_080653_991907_0E80DF93 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Okamoto Takayuki , Christoffer Dall , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Zhang Lei , Julien Grall , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:56:36PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 29/03/2019 13:00, Dave Martin wrote: > > This series implements support for allowing KVM guests to use the Arm > > Scalable Vector Extension (SVE), superseding the previous v6 series [1]. > > > > The patches are also available on a branch for reviewer convenience. [2] > > > > The patches are based on v5.1-rc2. > > > > This series addresses a couple of minor review comments received on v6 > > and otherwise applies reviewer tags only. The code differences > > between v6 and this series consist of minor cosmetic fixups only. > > > > Draft kvmtool patches were posted separately [3], [4]. > > > > For a description of minor updates, see the individual patches. > > > > > > Thanks go to Julien Thierry and Julian Grall for their review efforts, > > and to Zhang Lei for testing the series -- many thanks for their help > > in getting the series to this point! > > > > > > Reviewers' attention is drawn to the following patches, which have no > > Reviewed-by/Acked-by. Please take a look if you have a moment. > > > > * Patch 11 (KVM: arm64: Support runtime sysreg visibility filtering) > > > > Previously Reviewed-by Julien Thierry, but this version of the > > patch contains some minor rework suggested by Mark Rutland during > > the v5 review [5]. > > > > * Patch 15 (KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of > > in guest.c) > > > > (Trivial patch.) > > > > * Patch 26: (KVM: Document errors for KVM_GET_ONE_REG and > > KVM_SET_ONE_REG) > > > > (Documentation only.) > > > > * Patch 27: KVM: arm64/sve: Document KVM API extensions for SVE > > > > (Documentation only.) > > In order to get people to test this a bit more, I've now pushed this > series into -next. I'm pretty confident that it won't break a thing, but > better safe than sorry. I also expect any fix to be pushed on top of > this series. > > This doesn't mean that the review is over, quite the opposite. I intend > to go over it once more, and I'd like other people to do the same > (specially anyone looking at implementing the required support in QEMU). Agreed, thanks for pushing it to next. I'll continue testing and await further review from people. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel