From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498BDC10F0E for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17275205F4 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Oe76dDvM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 17275205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=P/2VpnYNr8/ObYSl2kQ+z01r0DcPXH88miId8kNzQW4=; b=Oe76dDvMLVaByy RHZ1ZwQy8ii/W95rmDCNTsdQbhHMK88ei6cPzZXjOMqz1LMd93YtXcZ21ynSaWVbrDgpOBcsa0yuK Z/jS7jRD2kpolUdZLVSQO+wwGQP5V62FKZNO54fdTkrMF7IflEkBj8Gqg5oMjtSgqhyBLQaI3AuvX 1FSTceFM/CcpyenCUgqX8mDH2YekKbn3nIreNkIAzj0+Ylc0ZhmGWIVYwBPCmWaMaDDKv1cLFr+cS 5WsTh5lzuLBBqxliQSmlqNn/pWSeUPnrfhk6cIH+THBc10swyhH9xxd6IAMFGg1gNcR3ETtysnwOH IP5lJqvO7AB5djTeW7Bw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEsYI-00023I-At; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:32:54 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEsYE-00022Z-Tr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:32:52 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053F915AB; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 02:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from red-moon (unknown [10.1.197.39]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E32ED3F59C; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 02:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:32:42 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Andrey Smirnov , Lucas Stach Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] i.MX6, DesignWare PCI improvements Message-ID: <20190412093242.GA8113@red-moon> References: <20190401042547.14067-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190401042547.14067-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190412_023250_962212_0C618E45 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "A.s. Dong" , Richard Zhu , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam , linux-imx@nxp.com, Bjorn Helgaas , Leonard Crestez , Chris Healy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 09:25:36PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Everyone: > > This is the series containing various small improvements that I made > while reading the code and researching commit history of pci-imx6.c > and pcie-designware*.c files. All changes are optional, so commits > that don't seem like an improvement can be easily dropped. Hopefully > each patch is self-explanatory. > > I tested this series on i.MX6Q, i.MX7D and i.MX8MQ. > > Feedback is welcome! > > Thanks, > Andrey Smirnov > > Changes since [v2]: > > - All non i.MX6 patches dropped, since they were accepted as a > seprarte series > > - Series rebased on lates 'dwc-pci' branch of PCI tree > > - Patches "PCI: imx6: Use flags to indicate support for suspend" > and "PCI: imx6: Replace calls to udelay() with usleep_range()" > added to the series > > Changes since [v1]: > > - Dropped "PCI: imx6: Drop imx6_pcie_link_up()" due to the matter > already having been addressed by "PCI: imx6: Fix link training > status detection in link up check" from Trent Piepho > > - Changed "designware" -> "dwc" for all subject lines > > - Collected Acked-by's from Gustavo Pimentel > > [v2] lkml.kernel.org/r/20190104174925.17153-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com > [v1] lkml.kernel.org/r/20181221072716.29017-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com > > Andrey Smirnov (11): > PCI: imx6: Simplify imx7d_pcie_wait_for_phy_pll_lock() > PCI: imx6: Remove redundant debug tracing > PCI: imx6: Return -ETIMEOUT from imx6_pcie_wait_for_speed_change() > PCI: imx6: Remove PCIE_PL_PFLR_* constants > PCI: dwc: imx6: Share PHY debug register definitions > PCI: imx6: Make use of BIT() in constant definitions > PCI: imx6: Simplify bit operations in PHY functions > PCI: imx6: Simplify pcie_phy_poll_ack() > PCI: imx6: Restrict PHY register data to 16-bit > PCI: imx6: Use flags to indicate support for suspend > PCI: imx6: Replace calls to udelay() with usleep_range() > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 119 ++++++++----------- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 12 +- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 + > 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) I am waiting for Lucas's review/ACKs to proceed with this series. Thanks, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel