Re: [PATCH v2 33/36] coresight: acpi: Support for components

From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robert.walker@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mike.leach@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/36] coresight: acpi: Support for components
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:45:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425174553.GB4080@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1555344260-12375-34-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:04:16PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> All AMBA devices are handled via ACPI AMBA scan notifier
> infrastructure. The platform devices get the ACPI id
> added to their driver.
> 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c                           | 9 +++++++++
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
> index 7f77c07..eef5a69 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@
>  
>  static const struct acpi_device_id amba_id_list[] = {
>  	{"ARMH0061", 0}, /* PL061 GPIO Device */
> +	{"ARMHC500", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight ETM4x */
> +	{"ARMHC501", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight ETR */
> +	{"ARMHC502", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight STM */
> +	{"ARMHC503", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight Debug */
> +	{"ARMHC979", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight TPIU */
> +	{"ARMHC97C", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight SoC-400 TMC, SoC-600 ETF/ETB */
> +	{"ARMHC98D", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight Dynamic Replicator */
> +	{"ARMHC9CA", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight CATU */
> +	{"ARMHC9FF", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight Funnel */
>  	{"", 0},
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> index 2eb489c..a8f42df 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>   * Description: CoreSight Replicator driver
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> @@ -290,11 +291,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id static_replicator_match[] = {
>  	{}
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id static_replicator_acpi_ids[] = {
> +	{"ARMHC985", 0}, /* ARM CoreSight Static Replicator */
> +};
> +#endif
>  static struct platform_driver static_replicator_driver = {
>  	.probe          = static_replicator_probe,
>  	.driver         = {
>  		.name   = "coresight-replicator",
> -		.of_match_table = static_replicator_match,
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(static_replicator_match),
> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(static_replicator_acpi_ids),
>  		.pm	= &replicator_dev_pm_ops,
>  		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>  	},

For the coresight part: Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

You probably want to split this patch in half so that Rafael can pick up the
the first part of it in his tree.

I am done reviewing the core part of this set and will do 33-36 next week.  For
the next revision I would leave them out and send a separate set in order to
avoid delaying the ACPI part.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel