From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18BEC43218 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91BC12077B for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="r3U6B/8k" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 91BC12077B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lfHwmfGVppLyArfrHqX4/Mv8RZrz7uwSjjckLKXjA7Q=; b=r3U6B/8kDklbUG ureXM/6UbpAOJa0kbDvAzu16SeihVw4a5w5EbC7HA2bbfCYXWrsK28fjz0dIAefH1d2CF8//Zzjcy boZh04J6bg9eTmnajmJb5er6i8aciueVB84WXh+0uX6Fhjx/URTqMulhB5y/no4YFEmp/8s4tgNUa 7dVw0mwmy6J7A4t1LW+9Dfoq+n1BaevewvDvk20toIzxJTsFLFVjIMCSTG4bFHASeh73+Xd3KI7iC X364k0jXYTW+O7dYuUH4qH+hRUvN1Fu+5DiqeRAkuG7Vh4+xW6Mw42QEQOBRColEdn364jdBeFC8C xNSI93fuI16sYEzkINBw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hK7Pm-0007qB-KK; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:25:46 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211] helo=newverein.lst.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hK7Pj-0007pY-2y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:25:44 +0000 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4B26F227A81; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:25:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:25:24 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nicolin Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RFC/RFT 1/5] ARM: dma-mapping: Add fallback normal page allocations Message-ID: <20190426202524.GA32071@lst.de> References: <20190326230131.16275-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20190326230131.16275-2-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20190424150638.GA22191@lst.de> <20190426202110.GA11129@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190426202110.GA11129@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190426_132543_285593_C3F49EC6 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.20 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tony@atomide.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, Christoph Hellwig , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 01:21:12PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > What do you think of dma_free_contiguous() instead? I feel "free" > is a bit more commonly used (in dma-mapping.h) and it's shorter. Yeah, that sounds good. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel