From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A74EC43219 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059F02053B for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lK4VJU0I"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="YR+4KDoK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 059F02053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ME+yY3PSP2raOxASTXfDTYxDKVkBTXJ02iXnTOHOmPI=; b=lK4VJU0ItUZMG8 uetQ3pThXoNJayIzlujOFbI/GpUHmLmTVAMtxO4zjVPte5CtXp/HhmN0TecHZ+RCQaQkEYVGDdD2n 9jdCFIckPAhHOijqtwuf1PqexJlX/KwQIrKVBH+Z+T12iDUacuXHIkq8Rg3p3YEfsSgHgQu5sw/Wt Y4w3T0QcWN/unWMtFRRBqfL8GocMastc2V3/PjtZYKPuwK+IvAzZ9RwQTy13JLpFjuTr1nxL8n530 EHeZ61li5nzucGxIn4TbublbMY/xjdFqQEW7V9qUTdRxLFEyZ1znLUWnK8P+tn8NMmQeN7TYgAgqi nY+7N+5J9NEKrXpMi7Vg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hL0Jo-0004jM-Lc; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:03:16 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hL0Ci-0005Rw-V0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 06:56:03 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id k8so8292441lja.8 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 23:55:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=f/SFxHqWTuce+B7hOCrn4MCwuAGCuKhiPGijyMFJ32A=; b=YR+4KDoK/DNmvAhfpktw9rxbkL0Q4jnnKxfxUCc9GgCG7/zKov7efPi02SKnTpAcYh ByuOQyEGRcOS4vnRGPvyak0zKhcSi72QlXfEwuReuQJ75894478RfMIVJQbFfA48tTn7 Z/qz/heykIRTIz0hIsEmV9kba82JIMoq0vG0zYCkmrDU+qkWR8kGJXtM1R8qw1ZZJhs+ 95JtA9INgPvlFHNLG+oYRfCc5lBd2puk+nJIaGjElHL1iHXKCdBgsfIX82ghji0KQinw KtHAtyi9tAbXkKIvRd88aS1bpForz4EXFkK+sstF7ZM3Om7nj3d1Mtk4RR5LsXoWaoG3 haug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=f/SFxHqWTuce+B7hOCrn4MCwuAGCuKhiPGijyMFJ32A=; b=ggxzwOrq1PrH+VWjiiEgQbsJxyImgyqKvFzSpxe5mw0Ez1a7wa9iidDF9adi6ihVve ife0rMUqCfFgNzizf3E07Dc5KpT2Aeo1TnFvw8H/i/hYmkpeynrTO0IT7/+ja1Nvp1/r cOOwoemI1KLiC2eozvCYlPu6gUqkTrGRvU1pLvp6LdXrz9c06Bd4glR214xSrd2zPbJa DwFIsYGFvZB57TSEAG/l6RaXOdZiDqE58qbq43ZxWhZl+RewCQFx6XrkFBH15UBjXKsX SoMrtQcU9sgBYhbLTcekUZEjWhCWpdR2HaagDtHfnKc5Uc/BL36lr0g8Qorzf89ntcme JyOA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVh9e65UFj1BFwGi0xynhVlVySHRAW5tjAPNJQipQdegR+56MI5 1zp5FWpg2b8V2kM+u9N2wNDvIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxphZgGLPcPLbt40yzYxwOA7EbUqYIPHKOsEZ/j6VBKmctI6SI3zoTjpf5XE3/m3kHaOcgmJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:106:: with SMTP id a6mr2634007ljb.175.1556520955392; Sun, 28 Apr 2019 23:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (h85-30-9-151.cust.a3fiber.se. [85.30.9.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t85sm627199lje.96.2019.04.28.23.55.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Apr 2019 23:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 23:32:42 -0700 From: Olof Johansson To: Marc Gonzalez Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: List arch/arm64/configs/ explicitly Message-ID: <20190429063242.blpen7vuuripsf56@localhost> References: <3d1862f6-f83d-dd8f-061f-8feff9588133@free.fr> <20190418131055.GE18646@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <4097b949-f285-b490-23cc-a8b4d9d37edf@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4097b949-f285-b490-23cc-a8b4d9d37edf@free.fr> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190428_235557_552822_149EBE6A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.33 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Heiko Stuebner , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Bjorn Andersson , arm-soc , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > On 18/04/2019 19:25, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Marc Gonzalez wrote: > >> > >> As it stands, get_maintainer.pl scans the changelog to determine the > >> recipients for arm64 defconfig patches: > >> > >> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > >> Catalin Marinas (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > >> Will Deacon (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > >> Heiko Stuebner (commit_signer:10/73=14%) > >> Simon Horman (commit_signer:9/73=12%) > >> Maxime Ripard (commit_signer:8/73=11%) > >> Olof Johansson (commit_signer:8/73=11%,added_lines:39/248=16%,removed_lines:63/135=47%) > >> Andy Gross (commit_signer:8/73=11%) > >> Jagan Teki (authored:7/73=10%) > >> Bjorn Andersson (authored:7/73=10%,added_lines:32/248=13%) > >> Enric Balletbo i Serra (authored:5/73=7%,added_lines:29/248=12%) > >> Stefan Wahren (authored:4/73=5%) > >> Ezequiel Garcia (authored:4/73=5%) > >> Marc Gonzalez (added_lines:53/248=21%,removed_lines:63/135=47%) > >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > >> > >> Explicitly list arch/arm64/configs/ in order to limit the recipients > >> list to AArch64 maintainers, and protect the innocent: > >> > >> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > >> Catalin Marinas (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > >> Will Deacon (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez > > > > This is inaccurate, most defconfig updates come in through arm-soc > > since most of them are platform related. > > What is inaccurate? My assessment of the situation? > ("As it stands, get_maintainer.pl scans the changelog to determine > the recipients for arm64 defconfig patches.") The list of maintainers is inaccurate. In general, defconfig updates should go in through the respective platform maintainers for platform-related changes. For architecture related changes, it'll go through Catalin/Will). > > For core features, Will and Catalin are there right maintainers. For > > platform options, they usually go to the platform maintainers and then > > to us. > > > > So, if you're turning on a feature for an SoC, send it to said > > SoC/platform maintainer. > > I want to stop receiving defconfig patches, just because I poked > the file a few months ago. The way maintenance of the file is setup, there's no good way to write a maintainer entry for it. None of us want these patches directly. We've dealt with this just fine for years on 32-bit ARM. Feel free to just delete these patches when you receive them. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel