From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E45C43219 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1662075E for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OrCFVrOd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EF1662075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=V2Op6MyMwXRCoPWoQLAv/dYEtZ8cgZP3Q+MgcxpTIUA=; b=OrCFVrOd66rXgF7EGib5mNapjb yRy2R8fBb+lWkhj3ZHLLdIsUA8xqNDjODLfVZSIEzSqLLWPgARNLRPX+Vj1keai68CBWtjoqh/kba CYJg8s/qDD821BKm4PAEL2cVdMz3DcRwHjZ8n+g/8wAc+UAoIFzF7Q3NJtkiMPkc4U7B4mU2kOUky g6NUNREtme8Nzt1mzlg5te7yelh9t3o5MooA3P21OixDVk851wLHWVvnttqAe3wTbLVHVaRfaM0gL 6xT/ulB7HfA6GxC5yCv3df7kioO0Pkma8pgGwZoVQ2pb8yOJEMXdKcTiwuGjO0u2qTlZ37OEsBfFN Xa2XzFUw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hLWCt-00069c-Lo; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:06:15 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hLWCK-0005TB-SF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:05:42 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8FA15A2; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0258C3F5C1; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:05:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:05:20 +0100 Message-Id: <20190430170520.29470-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190430170520.29470-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20190430170520.29470-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190430_100540_978399_D43FC6B6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.33 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Haibo Xu , Steve Capper , Richard Weinberger , jdike@addtoit.com, Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Oleg Nesterov , Bin Lu , Andy Lutomirski , Catalin Marinas MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add PTRACE_SYSEMU and PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP support on arm64. We don't need any special handling for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP. It's quite difficult to generalize handling PTRACE_SYSEMU cross architectures and avoid calls to tracehook_report_syscall_entry twice. Different architecture have different mechanism to indicate NO_SYSCALL and trying to generalise adds more code for no gain. Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 5 ++++- arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Hi Will, While I agree with your idea of consolidation of PTRACE_SYSEMU handling to core, it's quite a lot of change to do that, though it may be simple and confusing with indirection from arch code to core. Regards, Sudeep diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h index eb3ef73e07cf..c285d1ce7186 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk); * TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE - syscall trace active * TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT - syscall tracepoint for ftrace * TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT - syscall auditing + * TIF_SYSCALL_EMU - syscall emulation active * TIF_SECOMP - syscall secure computing * TIF_SIGPENDING - signal pending * TIF_NEED_RESCHED - rescheduling necessary @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk); #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9 #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 10 #define TIF_SECCOMP 11 +#define TIF_SYSCALL_EMU 12 #define TIF_MEMDIE 18 /* is terminating due to OOM killer */ #define TIF_FREEZE 19 #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 20 @@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk); #define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT) #define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) #define _TIF_SECCOMP (1 << TIF_SECCOMP) +#define _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_EMU) #define _TIF_UPROBE (1 << TIF_UPROBE) #define _TIF_FSCHECK (1 << TIF_FSCHECK) #define _TIF_32BIT (1 << TIF_32BIT) @@ -120,7 +123,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk); #define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \ _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \ - _TIF_NOHZ) + _TIF_NOHZ | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU) #define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \ { \ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c index b82e0a9b3da3..9353355cb91a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1819,8 +1819,12 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) { - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) || + test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) { tracehook_report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER); + if (!in_syscall(regs) || test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) + return -1; + } /* Do the secure computing after ptrace; failures should be fast. */ if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1) -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel