From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Uenal Mutlu <um@mutluit.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, FUKAUMI Naoki <naobsd@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
Pablo Greco <pgreco@centosproject.org>,
linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: ata: ahci_sunxi: Increased SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:59:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190513095916.yyjdtueeefkf4v4b@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190512205954.18435-1-um@mutluit.com>
Hi,
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:59:54PM +0200, Uenal Mutlu wrote:
> Increasing the SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs (P0DMACR.TXTS and .RXTS, ie.
> TX_TRANSACTION_SIZE and RX_TRANSACTION_SIZE) from default 0x0 each
> to 0x3 each, gives a write performance boost of 120 MiB/s to 132 MiB/s
> from lame 36 MiB/s to 45 MiB/s previously.
> Read performance is about 200 MiB/s.
> [tested on SSD using dd bs=2K/4K/8K/12K/16K/24K/32K: peak-perf at 12K].
>
> Tested on the Banana Pi R1 (aka Lamobo R1) and Banana Pi M1 SBCs
> with Allwinner A20 32bit-SoCs (ARMv7-a / arm-linux-gnueabihf).
> These devices are RaspberryPi-like small devices.
>
> This problem of slow SATA write-speed with these small devices lasts now
> for more than 5 years. Many commentators throughout the years wrongly
> assumed the slow write speed was a hardware limitation. This patch finally
> solves the problem, which in fact was just a hard-to-fix software problem
> (b/c of lack of documentation by the SoC-maker Allwinner Technology).
>
> RFC: Since more than about 25 similar SBC/SoC models do use the
> ahci_sunxi driver, users are encouraged to test it on all the
> affected boards and give feedback.
>
> Lists of the affected sunxi and other boards and SoCs with SATA using
> the ahci_sunxi driver:
> $ grep -i -e "^&ahci" arch/arm/boot/dts/sun*dts
> and http://linux-sunxi.org/SATA#Devices_with_SATA_ports
> See also http://linux-sunxi.org/Category:Devices_with_SATA_port
>
> Patch v2:
> - Commented the patch in-place in ahci_sunxi.c
> - With bs=12K and no conv=... passed to dd, the write performance
> rises further to 132 MiB/s
> - Changed MB/s to MiB/s
> - Posted the story behind the patch:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1905.1/03506.html
> - Posted a dd test script to find optimal bs, and some results:
> https://bit.ly/2YoOzEM
>
> Patch v1:
> - States bs=4K for dd and a write performance of 120 MiB/s
>
> Signed-off-by: Uenal Mutlu <um@mutluit.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Just a minor nitpick though, the part starting with RFC: and with the
version changelog should be after the --- below so that it doesn't get
applied as part of the commit log.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-12 20:59 [RFC PATCH v2 RESEND] drivers: ata: ahci_sunxi: Increased SATA/AHCI DMA TX/RX FIFOs Uenal Mutlu
2019-05-13 7:44 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-13 10:34 ` U.Mutlu
2019-05-13 11:20 ` Hans de Goede
2019-05-13 9:59 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2019-05-13 11:20 ` U.Mutlu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190513095916.yyjdtueeefkf4v4b@flea \
--to=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=naobsd@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver@schinagl.nl \
--cc=pgreco@centosproject.org \
--cc=um@mutluit.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox