From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC901C28CC3 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B682498E for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fDo5rwYK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C6B682498E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=pbExej2KRys312xus0/phobizHY25xaJMWBJiDAWZVA=; b=fDo5rwYKA9keJM gwLHK4tE/6vGuEQQK4Dfbe7R+9XO50ts6fhxKo2mm55dA1Qy7WBOqfaB7VlRlk3tH2MpF0VjGoTjy j5pM4b+lfqKzLwbGmSSNLBIQkO3ukQJ4QhFDPfauw3g1dLQ6VdfOkyDhPEhtmw5QI5J2Xuksy4IEH DZU2IzKMUCKBSXxSCl8heOif8X76vcoM8jFIsO1oQRdr/M80ePMio/LFg9ka3ofRm1lLQZKObCqlD x0MJnFqCvycvKfQaiV5FaaCzsCkVxdk7zePCerR1TEs0NpUHJNBe3neSdQ1YUsZTydUmaNs77ky+/ btWC8t9Ba2Zi4eBcQi5A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hYASK-0007ce-DR; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 14:30:28 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hYASH-0007cJ-HE for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 14:30:26 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41343341; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C5B83F690; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:30:20 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Qian Cai , rppt@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64/mm: fix a bogus GFP flag in pgd_alloc() Message-ID: <20190604143020.GD24467@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1559656836-24940-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> <20190604142338.GC24467@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190604142338.GC24467@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190604_073025_594688_81355058 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:23:38PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 10:00:36AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > > The commit "arm64: switch to generic version of pte allocation" > > introduced endless failures during boot like, > > > > kobject_add_internal failed for pgd_cache(285:chronyd.service) (error: > > -2 parent: cgroup) > > > > It turns out __GFP_ACCOUNT is passed to kernel page table allocations > > and then later memcg finds out those don't belong to any cgroup. > > Mike, I understood from [1] that this wasn't expected to be a problem, > as the accounting should bypass kernel threads. > > Was that assumption wrong, or is something different happening here? > > > backtrace: > > kobject_add_internal > > kobject_init_and_add > > sysfs_slab_add+0x1a8 > > __kmem_cache_create > > create_cache > > memcg_create_kmem_cache > > memcg_kmem_cache_create_func > > process_one_work > > worker_thread > > kthread > > > > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai > > --- > > arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c > > index 769516cb6677..53c48f5c8765 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) > > if (PGD_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE) > > return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(gfp); > > else > > - return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, gfp); > > + return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL); > > This is used to allocate PGDs for both user and kernel pagetables (e.g. > for the efi runtime services), so while this may fix the regression, I'm > not sure it's the right fix. I see that since [1], pgd_alloc() was updated to special-case the init_mm, which is not sufficient for cases like: efi_mm.pgd = pgd_alloc(&efi_mm) ... which occurs in a kthread. So let's have a pgd_alloc_kernel() to make that explicit. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel