From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI/PPTT: Add support for ACPI 6.3 thread flag
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:03:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190607100309.GE2429@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523224015.56270-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:40:14PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> ACPI 6.3 adds a flag to the CPU node to indicate whether
> the given PE is a thread. Add a function to return that
> information for a given linux logical CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index b72e6afaa8fb..6f43a0c05f61 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,43 @@ static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
> return retval;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * check_acpi_cpu_flag() - Determine if CPU node has a flag set
> + * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> + * @rev: The PPTT revision defining the flag
> + * @flag: The flag itself
> + *
> + * Check the node representing a CPU for a given flag.
> + *
> + * Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, the CPU cannot be found or
> + * the table revision isn't new enough.
> + * Otherwise returns flag value
> + */
> +static int check_acpi_cpu_flag(unsigned int cpu, int rev, u32 flag)
Initially, I thought we already have similar function, but I was wrong.
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> + acpi_status status;
> + u32 acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node = NULL;
> + int ret = -ENONET;
Unfortunately even ENONET is defined and will silently compile fine, but
I assume you need ENOENT as mentioned in the comment/doc.
> +
> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (table->revision >= rev)
> + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> +
> + if (cpu_node)
> + ret = cpu_node->flags & flag;
> +
> + acpi_put_table(table);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * acpi_find_last_cache_level() - Determines the number of cache levels for a PE
> * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> @@ -581,6 +618,21 @@ int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
> return status;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread() - Determine if logical CPU is a thread
> + * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> + *
> + *
> + * Return: 1, a thread
> + * 0, not a thread
> + * -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, the CPU cannot be found or
> + * the table revision isn't new enough.
> + */
> +int acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return check_acpi_cpu_flag(cpu, 2, ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_PROCESSOR_IS_THREAD);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * find_acpi_cpu_topology() - Determine a unique topology value for a given CPU
> * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> @@ -641,7 +693,6 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -
Spurious ?
> /**
> * find_acpi_cpu_topology_package() - Determine a unique CPU package value
> * @cpu: Kernel logical CPU number
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 98440df7fe42..513833233c65 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1314,10 +1314,15 @@ static inline int lpit_read_residency_count_address(u64 *address)
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT
> +int acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(unsigned int cpu);
> int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level);
> int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu);
> int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level);
> #else
> +static inline int acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> static inline int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.21.0
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-07 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-23 22:40 [PATCH 0/2] arm64/PPTT ACPI 6.3 thread flag support Jeremy Linton
2019-05-23 22:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI/PPTT: Add support for ACPI 6.3 thread flag Jeremy Linton
2019-06-07 10:03 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-05-23 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: topology: Use PPTT to determine if PE is a thread Jeremy Linton
2019-06-06 8:49 ` John Garry
2019-06-07 19:21 ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-10 8:30 ` John Garry
2019-06-11 19:02 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190607100309.GE2429@e107155-lin \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).