linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP2+: Make some variables static
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 05:18:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190610121843.GY5447@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190413141744.34488-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>

Hi,

* Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> [190413 07:18]:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:532:25: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio_hwmod_class' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:542:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio1_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:562:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio2_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:582:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio3_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static?

I just noticed this is still pending, sorry for the delay. Applying into
omap-for-v5.3/soc.

Regards,

Tony

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-10 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-13 14:17 [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP2+: Make some variables static Yue Haibing
2019-06-10 12:18 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190610121843.GY5447@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).