From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, enh <enh@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:57:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611145720.GA63588@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610175326.GC25803@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > index e5d5f31c6d36..9164ecb5feca 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size)
> > +#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
>
> I'm going to propose an opt-in method here (RFC for now). We can't have
> a check in untagged_addr() since this is already used throughout the
> kernel for both user and kernel addresses (khwasan) but we can add one
> in __range_ok(). The same prctl() option will be used for controlling
> the precise/imprecise mode of MTE later on. We can use a TIF_ flag here
> assuming that this will be called early on and any cloned thread will
> inherit this.
Updated patch, inlining it below. Once we agreed on the approach, I
think Andrey can insert in in this series, probably after patch 2. The
differences from the one I posted yesterday:
- renamed PR_* macros together with get/set variants and the possibility
to disable the relaxed ABI
- sysctl option - /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr to disable the ABI globally
(just the prctl() opt-in, tasks already using it won't be affected)
And, of course, it needs more testing.
---------8<----------------
From 7c624777a4e545522dec1b34e60f0229cb2bd59f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:03:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user
addresses ABI
It is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses into
the kernel indiscriminately. This patch introduces a prctl() interface
for enabling or disabling the tagged ABI with a global sysctl control
for preventing applications from enabling the relaxed ABI (meant for
testing user-space prctl() return error checking without reconfiguring
the kernel). The ABI properties are inherited by threads of the same
application and fork()'ed children but cleared on execve().
The PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL will be expanded in the future to handle
MTE-specific settings like imprecise vs precise exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 6 +++
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 5 ++-
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 5 +++
kernel/sys.c | 16 +++++++
6 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
index fcd0e691b1ea..fee457456aa8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -307,6 +307,12 @@ extern void __init minsigstksz_setup(void);
/* PR_PAC_RESET_KEYS prctl */
#define PAC_RESET_KEYS(tsk, arg) ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(tsk, arg)
+/* PR_TAGGED_ADDR prctl */
+long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(unsigned long arg);
+long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(void);
+#define SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL(arg) set_tagged_addr_ctrl(arg)
+#define GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL() get_tagged_addr_ctrl()
+
/*
* For CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
index c285d1ce7186..7263d4c973ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define TIF_SVE 23 /* Scalable Vector Extension in use */
#define TIF_SVE_VL_INHERIT 24 /* Inherit sve_vl_onexec across exec */
#define TIF_SSBD 25 /* Wants SSB mitigation */
+#define TIF_TAGGED_ADDR 26
#define _TIF_SIGPENDING (1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 9164ecb5feca..995b9ea11a89 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
{
unsigned long ret, limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit;
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR))
+ addr = untagged_addr(addr);
+
__chk_user_ptr(addr);
asm volatile(
// A + B <= C + 1 for all A,B,C, in four easy steps:
@@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
return ret;
}
-#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size)
#define user_addr_max get_fs
#define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to) \
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 3767fb21a5b8..69d0be1fc708 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/stddef.h>
+#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
#include <linux/user.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -323,6 +324,7 @@ void flush_thread(void)
fpsimd_flush_thread();
tls_thread_flush();
flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(current);
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
}
void release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
@@ -552,3 +554,68 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
ptrauth_thread_init_user(current);
}
+
+/*
+ * Control the relaxed ABI allowing tagged user addresses into the kernel.
+ */
+static unsigned int tagged_addr_prctl_allowed = 1;
+
+long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(unsigned long arg)
+{
+ if (!tagged_addr_prctl_allowed)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (is_compat_task())
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (arg & ~PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (arg & PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE)
+ set_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
+ else
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(void)
+{
+ if (!tagged_addr_prctl_allowed)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (is_compat_task())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR))
+ return PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Global sysctl to disable the tagged user addresses support. This control
+ * only prevents the tagged address ABI enabling via prctl() and does not
+ * disable it for tasks that already opted in to the relaxed ABI.
+ */
+static int zero;
+static int one = 1;
+
+static struct ctl_table tagged_addr_sysctl_table[] = {
+ {
+ .procname = "tagged_addr",
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .data = &tagged_addr_prctl_allowed,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = &zero,
+ .extra2 = &one,
+ },
+ { }
+};
+
+static int __init tagged_addr_init(void)
+{
+ if (!register_sysctl("abi", tagged_addr_sysctl_table))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+core_initcall(tagged_addr_init);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
index 094bb03b9cc2..2e927b3e9d6c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
@@ -229,4 +229,9 @@ struct prctl_mm_map {
# define PR_PAC_APDBKEY (1UL << 3)
# define PR_PAC_APGAKEY (1UL << 4)
+/* Tagged user address controls for arm64 */
+#define PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL 55
+#define PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL 56
+# define PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE (1UL << 0)
+
#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index 2969304c29fe..ec48396b4943 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -124,6 +124,12 @@
#ifndef PAC_RESET_KEYS
# define PAC_RESET_KEYS(a, b) (-EINVAL)
#endif
+#ifndef SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL
+# define SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL(a) (-EINVAL)
+#endif
+#ifndef GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL
+# define GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL() (-EINVAL)
+#endif
/*
* this is where the system-wide overflow UID and GID are defined, for
@@ -2492,6 +2498,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
return -EINVAL;
error = PAC_RESET_KEYS(me, arg2);
break;
+ case PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL:
+ if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ error = SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL(arg2);
+ break;
+ case PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL:
+ if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ error = GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL();
+ break;
default:
error = -EINVAL;
break;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-11 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 16:55 [PATCH v16 00/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 01/16] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:02 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:06 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:24 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-04 11:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 17:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:07 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-12 9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:52 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-11 17:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:03 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 03/16] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:06 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 04/16] mm: untag user pointers in do_pages_move Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:18 ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-12 11:08 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 05/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 15:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:13 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 06/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:59 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 07/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 4:00 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 08/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:38 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 09/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 4:03 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 10/16] drm/amdgpu, arm64: untag user pointers Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 11/16] drm/radeon, arm64: untag user pointers in radeon_gem_userptr_ioctl Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 12/16] IB, arm64: untag user pointers in ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:09 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 13/16] media/v4l2-core, arm64: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 14/16] tee, arm64: untag user pointers in tee_shm_register Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-07 5:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-08 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 15/16] vfio/type1, arm64: untag user pointers in vaddr_get_pfn Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:58 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 16/16] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08 3:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 22:08 ` shuah
2019-06-11 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:18 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:14 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190611145720.GA63588@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Jacob.Bramley@arm.com \
--cc=Lee.Smith@arm.com \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).