linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: logic_pio: Use logical PIO low-level accessors for !CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:50:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614115056.GP13533@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7495dcab-f293-4b2a-4740-2249f61351f7@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:02:52AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 13/06/2019 21:09, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:39:12AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> > > On 13/06/2019 03:39, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure it's even safe, because CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO depends on
> > > > ARM64,  but PCI_IOBASE is defined on most arches via asm-generic/io.h,
> > > > so this potentially affects arches other than ARM64.
> > > 
> > > It would do. It would affect any arch which defines PCI_IOBASE and
> > > does not have arch-specific definition of inb et all.
> 
> > What's the reason for testing PCI_IOBASE instead of
> > CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO?  If there's a reason it's needed, that's fine,
> > but it does make this much more complicated to review.
> 
> For ARM64, we have PCI_IOBASE defined but may not have
> CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO defined. Currently CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO is only
> selected by CONFIG_HISILICON_LPC.
> 
> As such, we should make this change also for when
> CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO is not defined.

OK.  This is all very important for the commit log -- we need to
understand what arches are affected and the reason they need it.

Since the goal of this series is to fix an ARM64-specific issue, and
the typical port I/O model is for each arch to #define its own inb(),
maybe it would make sense to move the "#define inb logic_inb" from
linux/logic_pio.h to arm64/include/asm/io.h?

The "#ifndef inb" arrangement gets pretty complicated when it occurs
more than one place (asm-generic/io.h and logic_pio.h) and we have to
start worrying about the ordering of #includes.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-11 14:12 [PATCH v4 0/3] Fix ARM64 crash for accessing unmapped IO port regions John Garry
2019-06-11 14:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: logic_pio: Use logical PIO low-level accessors for !CONFIG_INDIRECT_PIO John Garry
2019-06-13  2:39   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-06-13  9:39     ` John Garry
2019-06-13 20:09       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-06-14  9:02         ` John Garry
2019-06-14 11:50           ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-06-14 12:22             ` John Garry
2019-06-13 13:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-06-13 15:21     ` John Garry
2019-06-11 14:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] lib: logic_pio: Reject accesses to unregistered CPU MMIO regions John Garry
2019-06-13  3:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-06-13  7:47     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-13 10:17     ` John Garry
2019-06-13 13:46       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-06-13 14:09         ` John Garry
2019-06-11 14:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] lib: logic_pio: Fix up a print John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190614115056.GP13533@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).