From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E56DC48BD6 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72291217D4 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="W26Evzsp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 72291217D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7CH9oHTRsWpwJWPWywyxn0+JwuFdYD+QcVDprlfFKiE=; b=W26EvzspzB2bEV r7RcmaG0FSxw8Y6cZ8TiF1+13FYDKIwkS+sSmusbWK+rFkr5vutJWvziAt3h9MEWGM/FIDRC7IOoJ M1DLmNx6H8gJX+bGbVX8mGBAOK+rz+z72i+r3iIAI+L3acKogGR9nU6J5Wui+HLj74FSW9BAlo/zC 9AawDmfOoelaUoawTC2atwK3l9MxbRvnl3z/5MKaKKxYP4kMQiy+Sdt6543jGWwvis5NVplVNgTQe u1q5XPKQVMCH0PkA3kIcV6t8Y2mmJlgcVpdCJ/zShZV2F1GhreR/tE/D+x60k9yh/H4cCZCBXPXb9 Uw8tA/Qk3jCoEkqnBg2w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgA0H-0006RU-1D; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:38:33 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgA0D-0006Qo-QY; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:38:29 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:38:29 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Devmap cleanups + arm64 support Message-ID: <20190626153829.GA22138@infradead.org> References: <20190626073533.GA24199@infradead.org> <20190626123139.GB20635@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190626123139.GB20635@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Hocko , anshuman.khandual@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-mm@kvack.org, Jason Gunthorpe , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:35:33AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Robin, Andrew: > > As a heads-up, Robin is currently on holiday, so this is all down to > Andrew's preference. > > > I have a series for the hmm tree, which touches the section size > > bits, and remove device public memory support. > > > > It might be best if we include this series in the hmm tree as well > > to avoid conflicts. Is it ok to include the rebase version of at least > > the cleanup part (which looks like it is not required for the actual > > arm64 support) in the hmm tree to avoid conflicts? > > Per the cover letter, the arm64 patch has a build dependency on the > others, so that might require a stable brnach for the common prefix. I guess we'll just have to live with the merge errors then, as the mm tree is a patch series and thus can't easily use a stable base tree. That is unlike Andrew wants to pull in the hmm tree as a prep patch for the series. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel