From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@arm.com>
Cc: julien.thierry@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jpoimboe@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 12/18] arm64: assembler: Add macro to annotate asm function having non standard stack-frame.
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:40:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701144039.GD21774@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624095548.8578-13-raphael.gault@arm.com>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:55:42AM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -752,4 +752,17 @@ USER(\label, ic ivau, \tmp2) // invalidate I line PoU
> .Lyield_out_\@ :
> .endm
>
> + /*
> + * This macro is the arm64 assembler equivalent of the
> + * macro STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD define at
> + * ~/include/linux/frame.h
> + */
> + .macro asm_stack_frame_non_standard func
> +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
> + .pushsection ".discard.func_stack_frame_non_standard"
> + .8byte \func
Nitpicks:
Does .quad vs .8byte make any difference?
Could we place this in include/linux/frame.h directly with a generic
name (and some __ASSEMBLY__ guards)? It doesn't look to be arm specific.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-01 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-24 9:55 [RFC V3 00/18] objtool: Add support for arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 01/18] objtool: Add abstraction for computation of symbols offsets Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 02/18] objtool: orc: Refactor ORC API for other architectures to implement Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 03/18] objtool: Move registers and control flow to arch-dependent code Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 04/18] objtool: arm64: Add required implementation for supporting the aarch64 architecture in objtool Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 05/18] objtool: special: Adapt special section handling Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 06/18] objtool: arm64: Adapt the stack frame checks for arm architecture Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 07/18] objtool: Introduce INSN_UNKNOWN type Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 08/18] objtool: Refactor switch-tables code to support other architectures Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 09/18] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 10/18] objtool: arm64: Implement functions to add switch tables alternatives Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 11/18] arm64: alternative: Mark .altinstr_replacement as containing executable instructions Raphael Gault
2019-07-01 14:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 12/18] arm64: assembler: Add macro to annotate asm function having non standard stack-frame Raphael Gault
2019-07-01 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-07-02 9:49 ` Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 13/18] arm64: sleep: Prevent stack frame warnings from objtool Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 14/18] arm64: kvm: Annotate non-standard stack frame functions Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 15/18] arm64: kernel: Add exception on kuser32 to prevent stack analysis Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 16/18] arm64: crypto: Add exceptions for crypto object " Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 17/18] arm64: kernel: Annotate non-standard stack frame functions Raphael Gault
2019-06-24 9:55 ` [RFC V3 18/18] objtool: arm64: Enable stack validation for arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-07-10 7:31 ` [RFC V3 00/18] objtool: Add support " Raphael Gault
2019-07-10 14:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190701144039.GD21774@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raphael.gault@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).