From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8BCC606C2 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CB421479 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="figwxX8u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D7CB421479 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=pbNPraKVW2Q9vT4Ewl5VD4tigduPkcwUuXyg7y9DCks=; b=figwxX8uES2SgfEFwk0Tt1BkkH qu6Y8ouziSJGf6M1reENQHYfTqBL2U2S6siBA/i8lVAf/Ztr6B5myaD5bDzgh0VbwS5qqJUlhTJcA lJkhsIXJpIq+nxZ0ytuukAxeK0Ver37BYL0PH4cZRXjJuw1CoDUzcqV6XFJC+aK9SeEmrcCepmrjU iiD22RQYln5Dtsn5Tu/VUOt4gcVpQmkeUU5umv0ZF2LLoOpw9tcZ2e0cI2YxPpcfAaYibveHtoRT3 4cI+tUV9jB+AK5Zp4hXinz3UZ1k0w7HEtg11X4NIWSd2PZf3N3PIlV7DlCiN4Z2md0mEBITiomwDp SY2tJleg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hkVso-000553-D4; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:48:50 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hkVrm-00048A-Gs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:47:48 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4A61516; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3C8C33F59C; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:47:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Separate out tx buffer handling and prepare to add rx Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:47:23 +0100 Message-Id: <20190708154730.16643-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190708154730.16643-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20190708154730.16643-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190708_084746_662321_60019F3F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peng Fan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bo Zhang , Jim Quinlan , Sudeep Holla , Volodymyr Babchuk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Currently we pre-allocate transmit buffers only and use the first free slot in that pre-allocated buffer for transmitting any new message that are generally originated from OS to the platform firmware. Notifications or the delayed responses on the other hand are originated from the platform firmware and consumes by the OS. It's better to have separate and dedicated pre-allocated buffers to handle the notifications. We can still use the transmit buffers for the delayed responses. In addition, let's prepare existing scmi_xfer_{get,put} for acquiring and releasing a slot to identify the right(tx/rx) buffers. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index e9b762348eff..1a7ffd3f8534 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct scmi_chan_info { * @handle: Instance of SCMI handle to send to clients * @version: SCMI revision information containing protocol version, * implementation version and (sub-)vendor identification. - * @minfo: Message info + * @tx_minfo: Universal Transmit Message management info * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Tx channel info pointer * @rx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Rx channel info pointer * @protocols_imp: List of protocols implemented, currently maximum of @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ struct scmi_info { const struct scmi_desc *desc; struct scmi_revision_info version; struct scmi_handle handle; - struct scmi_xfers_info minfo; + struct scmi_xfers_info tx_minfo; struct idr tx_idr; struct idr rx_idr; u8 *protocols_imp; @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static void scmi_tx_prepare(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m) * scmi_xfer_get() - Allocate one message * * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle + * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type * * Helper function which is used by various message functions that are * exposed to clients of this driver for allocating a message traffic event. @@ -261,13 +262,13 @@ static void scmi_tx_prepare(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m) * * Return: 0 if all went fine, else corresponding error. */ -static struct scmi_xfer *scmi_xfer_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle) +static struct scmi_xfer *scmi_xfer_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, + struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo) { u16 xfer_id; struct scmi_xfer *xfer; unsigned long flags, bit_pos; struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); - struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->minfo; /* Keep the locked section as small as possible */ spin_lock_irqsave(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags); @@ -290,18 +291,17 @@ static struct scmi_xfer *scmi_xfer_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle) } /** - * scmi_xfer_put() - Release a message + * __scmi_xfer_put() - Release a message * - * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle + * @minfo: Pointer to Tx/Rx Message management info based on channel type * @xfer: message that was reserved by scmi_xfer_get * * This holds a spinlock to maintain integrity of internal data structures. */ -void scmi_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +static void +__scmi_xfer_put(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { unsigned long flags; - struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); - struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->minfo; /* * Keep the locked section as small as possible @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m) struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = client_to_scmi_chan_info(cl); struct device *dev = cinfo->dev; struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle); - struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->minfo; + struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->tx_minfo; struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload; xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(ioread32(&mem->msg_header)); @@ -351,6 +351,19 @@ static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m) complete(&xfer->done); } +/** + * scmi_xfer_put() - Release a transmit message + * + * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle + * @xfer: message that was reserved by scmi_xfer_get + */ +void scmi_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +{ + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); + + __scmi_xfer_put(&info->tx_minfo, xfer); +} + static bool scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { @@ -440,7 +453,7 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) } /** - * scmi_xfer_get_init() - Allocate and initialise one message + * scmi_xfer_get_init() - Allocate and initialise one message for transmit * * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle * @msg_id: Message identifier @@ -461,6 +474,7 @@ int scmi_xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 msg_id, u8 prot_id, int ret; struct scmi_xfer *xfer; struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); + struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->tx_minfo; struct device *dev = info->dev; /* Ensure we have sane transfer sizes */ @@ -468,7 +482,7 @@ int scmi_xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 msg_id, u8 prot_id, tx_size > info->desc->max_msg_size) return -ERANGE; - xfer = scmi_xfer_get(handle); + xfer = scmi_xfer_get(handle, minfo); if (IS_ERR(xfer)) { ret = PTR_ERR(xfer); dev_err(dev, "failed to get free message slot(%d)\n", ret); @@ -607,7 +621,7 @@ static int scmi_xfer_info_init(struct scmi_info *sinfo) struct scmi_xfer *xfer; struct device *dev = sinfo->dev; const struct scmi_desc *desc = sinfo->desc; - struct scmi_xfers_info *info = &sinfo->minfo; + struct scmi_xfers_info *info = &sinfo->tx_minfo; /* Pre-allocated messages, no more than what hdr.seq can support */ if (WARN_ON(desc->max_msg >= MSG_TOKEN_MAX)) { -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel