From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F04C76196 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4859B21850 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="jPSHduey" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4859B21850 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WfF0mxEyKQbKJQ7Rmt0bTbNgNaKkJWO4uDZlijvkiNQ=; b=jPSHdueybFORpY 98bCwwUA6U8Hxbb1fRa/Gz8sshWoziFWAuPsTyAuCfoEMpbZnMrzb19Tp/jFfSKZzznxlvBC1TqMU 5xkOTBpaioFyW/B7D1nWXGboPx3D9wukVfZr+lnI1lKaAWr4JKKJQSC5+uE4hCNQBylUfV/dqPkP4 pRSBlhIl8kXRmJ+IZ5GSKavy13CanLYz6FgN6L3eZ2e9UUUX07NgZ7VV4anhauizxfcqlpNomSwiZ fmrqycNkBmcOiIqgFoxe1w8qt/STXETQunSD49i+MWa/czOe20es8TIfDMqE93b3e22qb0xHS1XeY oFA3t8tE5YJ/S+yzQuSw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hoQ8q-0003pT-9h; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:29:32 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hoQ8m-0003o4-GO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:29:29 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5850337; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 03:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 080BC3F59C; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 03:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:29:24 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Jim Quinlan Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Message-ID: <20190719102924.GB18022@e107155-lin> References: <20190708154730.16643-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190708154730.16643-6-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190719_032928_613020_A360859A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peng Fan , Bo Zhang , Volodymyr Babchuk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > I'm not sure why you are adding code for notifications when this commit-set > does not support notifications. Why not save this commit for when you add > notifications? > Right, I missed this patch and sent. Yes we just need Rx channels and not Rx buffers to implement asynchronous commands. I will drop it from this set. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel