From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F40C7618B for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE00218D4 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="OPDq2uYJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6BE00218D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=nLwKycOyh32UwGfNc1ln6W7uOn/zd6kUiSunZkxo11A=; b=OPDq2uYJdqtwMU U9Q74lAydMVckI822Ef+HE9gPjXc0172peQDtS273nw0RGxb4bsHF0WNTIm/iNA4xbEDNYuToiPwJ GggGpN0me6WxzAOWsNyVinl+fhdBsDEn1KYZQ7x0tslR487s7j63015X36tT6UX6P2AM7lfTJLr10 VhC5PIX7wmGP6a7Y54AlFRkk93p8EUFy5TH0LxO3Xc2Te+dg7GsfZMCXPF1/IhGWXEzn1hMoNa75x Pzrvv9Ev39sRhfdxpbJrS8LWBGQtM/T79n006ofy5IM07gQ0aI0Q3hGx+d7rUN5vzPN9QH7St+alS d4dIhZnrdXRqASPLLQtg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hpsWb-0006tf-Fj; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:00:05 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hpsWY-0006UH-LN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:00:04 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D6F337; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C820A3F71A; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:59:58 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible Message-ID: <20190723105958.GB2815@e107155-lin> References: <20190708154730.16643-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190708154730.16643-12-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190722212954.8924D21900@mail.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190722212954.8924D21900@mail.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190723_040002_763811_0FEF560B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peng Fan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bo Zhang , Jim Quinlan , Sudeep Holla , Volodymyr Babchuk , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 02:29:53PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Sudeep Holla (2019-07-08 08:47:30) > > CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum > > number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the > > platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous > > clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached. > > > > Keeping the current count of pending asynchronous clock set rate > > requests, we can decide if we can you asynchronous request for the > > This last part of the sentence doesn't read properly. Please rewrite. > Will fix. > > incoming/new request. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > > index dd215bd11a58..70044b7c812e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > > @@ -221,21 +222,35 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id, > > u64 rate) > > { > > int ret; > > + u32 flags = 0; > > struct scmi_xfer *t; > > struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg; > > + struct clock_info *ci = handle->clk_priv; > > > > ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, CLOCK_RATE_SET, SCMI_PROTOCOL_CLOCK, > > sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > + if (ci->max_async_req) { > > + if (atomic_inc_return(&ci->cur_async_req) < ci->max_async_req) > > + flags |= CLOCK_SET_ASYNC; > > + else > > + atomic_dec(&ci->cur_async_req); > > Can this be combined with the atomic_dec() below and done after either > transfer? > Yes but cleaner. > > + } > > + > > cfg = t->tx.buf; > > - cfg->flags = cpu_to_le32(0); > > + cfg->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); > > cfg->id = cpu_to_le32(clk_id); > > cfg->value_low = cpu_to_le32(rate & 0xffffffff); > > cfg->value_high = cpu_to_le32(rate >> 32); > > > > - ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); > > + if (flags & CLOCK_SET_ASYNC) { > > + ret = scmi_do_xfer_with_response(handle, t); > > + atomic_dec(&ci->cur_async_req); > > + } else { > > + ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); > > + } > > I mean putting the atomic_dec() here. > Understood and done locally, will post as v2. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel