From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B0BC32753 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 02:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928022173E for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 02:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="EHmMY+pI"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RBxCANB3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 928022173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aba2NAgeVNioybm8MhYTWKkZWCHuESm2O+1x45fij7Q=; b=EHmMY+pIQeWFVn RlGaSOCMXukRPwGWAKjYz+4GFCUs4Y3/QFExLbeUJ8PejBA5ZAiYN/oNOm6qZM5n1jxrC0rqnQ9if 8IDxu7nQeXzoh0ZtqhGp8VcuCjeGqYxkq30FEaJtcMJx04iAFZzW/7UUOHBCoewy/MMUTwJ+qAVOL F9f1hz8db0u1tx5a7HPt8xcRCkLLozfLxumZ3B7+yiS6mrTGtSMG34TNA47SoFOFXjrzXMhVaKKab 5VkybUfA9vTcD96aFyX9jfsaseyLSmI22aMROIJaij/rzIZmPUUUq3Qvxfsuq00WNOOmFlUWCxDrs zFkFJECfdKjFmltrFz/Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1htNBI-0001s9-VF; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:20:33 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1htNB0-0001Xl-EY; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 02:20:16 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id az7so32985495plb.5; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:20:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qVOEtC+FJUT8up8TCOoMm5YvZPMSmdk5e2B42ED2yyM=; b=RBxCANB3yj2IBv5n/MeFkevk6r/YWJp6ncSc5OW5MYkrOwdGQoB8NmKW/T7bWgCq4d ogyVsF3wAZIqX0pJbAgFZpVhPYy6OCZZYi41BAejxiD0VJCO8w/MyyeZOUOVBXs6OiBT 3HejGNLei8PHKM8Eoxy7r1HjtWg6EZKcWpVkGmP03BddemdqJEnch4O6hL9YpjUNSmsi S3idj2n9DD1vrmCTU9ZxixJF1czgcLrKpLmb9NIGAStVAt9/y4twPWvfN7Ux0CU8Wgrf xyg7g19gwJP3XgmJ+2kbBsMXQEe5u6yN514RiiZUh+ZUk9oY3+b/fuOz5O7S8kKnCATI uYVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qVOEtC+FJUT8up8TCOoMm5YvZPMSmdk5e2B42ED2yyM=; b=YvoltWHiZkHnh8jl9wXEtzrBEng+dHfCBWMVkaN/9o5O6x5EE5oq7g772gybzrFwa7 KrKf7X+J2Lwih9a0IA6+YotOg/V+9QacP39VMzTlRSVOTgfJx8rhSelKDytNTfWkHoAH JjOjufchb1gk/KCNWx37hWjB9+yGjpWwj9mzaUx88qTK7oLwfwF72VreIt+G0bf/HhNU FYrxE9CVCpIcg+Fqr1j8sEgCfSLdDunojSDkM21zUpH6inShTMzu3ZVBQXYm/+HaO/zM l18qOzHlTg1Hnzi1vWvFD/Vd7zWdRIvGOUTj6XYKesLeiWgR8SCk16CR70l3Q+92DVq0 CkAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUobbK0rZIN3QKsgS8dXlbDacDyXVgH1X9++l/G6Lw4l4oVy1RJ VgsrU2Ozzyo9OfGneftkzl0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzRQ4S39LIYUw8vjSMlFZMRPugsy/9HDj+OwNNSlxD2DcqfIJG2lr7vJHF9h1rGbVRTrjyILg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e6:: with SMTP id a93mr128590426pla.175.1564712413432; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blueforge.nvidia.com (searspoint.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u9sm38179744pgc.5.2019.08.01.19.20.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 19:20:12 -0700 (PDT) From: john.hubbard@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: jhubbard@nvidia.com To: Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH 01/34] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock() Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 19:19:32 -0700 Message-Id: <20190802022005.5117-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190802022005.5117-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> References: <20190802022005.5117-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NVConfidentiality: public X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190801_192014_489054_C7C0AD58 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Dave Chinner , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, John Hubbard , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Glisse?= , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: John Hubbard Provide more capable variation of put_user_pages_dirty_lock(), and delete put_user_pages_dirty(). This is based on the following: 1. Lots of call sites become simpler if a bool is passed into put_user_page*(), instead of making the call site choose which put_user_page*() variant to call. 2. Christoph Hellwig's observation that set_page_dirty_lock() is usually correct, and set_page_dirty() is usually a bug, or at least questionable, within a put_user_page*() calling chain. This leads to the following API choices: * put_user_pages_dirty_lock(page, npages, make_dirty) * There is no put_user_pages_dirty(). You have to hand code that, in the rare case that it's required. Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ira Weiny Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c | 5 +- drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 10 +- include/linux/mm.h | 5 +- mm/gup.c | 115 +++++++++------------ 7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c index 08da840ed7ee..965cf9dea71a 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c @@ -54,10 +54,7 @@ static void __ib_umem_release(struct ib_device *dev, struct ib_umem *umem, int d for_each_sg_page(umem->sg_head.sgl, &sg_iter, umem->sg_nents, 0) { page = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter); - if (umem->writable && dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1); - else - put_user_page(page); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, umem->writable && dirty); } sg_free_table(&umem->sg_head); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c index b89a9b9aef7a..469acb961fbd 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c @@ -118,10 +118,7 @@ int hfi1_acquire_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, size_t np void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page **p, size_t npages, bool dirty) { - if (dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages); - else - put_user_pages(p, npages); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages, dirty); if (mm) { /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */ atomic64_sub(npages, &mm->pinned_vm); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c index bfbfbb7e0ff4..6bf764e41891 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c @@ -40,10 +40,7 @@ static void __qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages, int dirty) { - if (dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages); - else - put_user_pages(p, num_pages); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages, dirty); } /** diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c index 0b0237d41613..62e6ffa9ad78 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c @@ -75,10 +75,7 @@ static void usnic_uiom_put_pages(struct list_head *chunk_list, int dirty) for_each_sg(chunk->page_list, sg, chunk->nents, i) { page = sg_page(sg); pa = sg_phys(sg); - if (dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1); - else - put_user_page(page); + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, dirty); usnic_dbg("pa: %pa\n", &pa); } kfree(chunk); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c index 67171c82b0c4..ab83a9cec562 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c @@ -63,15 +63,7 @@ struct siw_mem *siw_mem_id2obj(struct siw_device *sdev, int stag_index) static void siw_free_plist(struct siw_page_chunk *chunk, int num_pages, bool dirty) { - struct page **p = chunk->plist; - - while (num_pages--) { - if (!PageDirty(*p) && dirty) - put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, 1); - else - put_user_page(*p); - p++; - } + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(chunk->plist, num_pages, dirty); } void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 0334ca97c584..9759b6a24420 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1057,8 +1057,9 @@ static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page) put_page(page); } -void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages); -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages); +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, + bool make_dirty); + void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages); #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index 98f13ab37bac..7fefd7ab02c4 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -29,85 +29,70 @@ struct follow_page_context { unsigned int page_mask; }; -typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page); - -static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, - unsigned long npages, - set_dirty_func_t sdf) -{ - unsigned long index; - - for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) { - struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]); - - /* - * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with - * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases: - * - * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips - * the call to sdf(). That could happen because - * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(), - * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is - * going to get written back, which meets the original - * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well: - * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call - * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back. - * - * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf(). - * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it - * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle. - * This is harmless. - */ - if (!PageDirty(page)) - sdf(page); - - put_user_page(page); - } -} - /** - * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages - * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released. + * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages + * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. + * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty * * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() * variants called on that page. * * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a - * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release - * the page using put_user_page(). + * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously + * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), + * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. * * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. * - * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here. - * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is - * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead. + * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is + * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, + * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: + * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). * */ -void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, + bool make_dirty) { - __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty); + unsigned long index; -/** - * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages - * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released. - * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. - * - * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a - * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release - * the page using put_user_page(). - * - * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. - * - * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes - * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty(). - * - */ -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) -{ - __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock); + /* + * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is + * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a + * single operation to the head page should suffice. + */ + + if (!make_dirty) { + put_user_pages(pages, npages); + return; + } + + for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) { + struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]); + /* + * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with + * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key + * cases: + * + * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it + * skips the call to set_page_dirty(). That could happen + * because clear_page_dirty_for_io() called + * page_mkclean(), followed by set_page_dirty(). + * However, now the page is going to get written back, + * which meets the original intention of setting it + * dirty, so all is well: clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes + * on to call TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page + * back. + * + * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls + * set_page_dirty(). The page stays dirty, despite being + * written back, so it gets written back again in the + * next writeback cycle. This is harmless. + */ + if (!PageDirty(page)) + set_page_dirty_lock(page); + put_user_page(page); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); -- 2.22.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel