From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
ynorov@caviumnetworks.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Subject: Re: Detecting AArch32 support from a AArch64 process in user space
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808112817.GH10425@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09a5d28f865ef0bd034ba9acbe1b5334@agner.ch>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 12:30:03PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2019-08-08 11:35, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:36:42AM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> >> [resend this time with the correct mailing list address]
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am trying to detect whether an ARMv8 system running in AArch64 state
> >> supports AArch32 state from a user space process. The arm64_features[]
> >> in
> >
> > Why? Is this just for diagnostic purposes, or some programmatic reason?
>
> The use case I currently have in mind is to decide whether to show
> 32-bit ARM Docker images in a UI (or arm32v7 images how it is nowadays
> called in Docker land).
>
> >
> > In the latter case, just try to do what ever it is you want to do that
> > depends on AArch32: if it fails, you don't have AArch32.
>
>
> Yeah one option I considered was just fetching a minimalistic arm32v7
> container, but still seems a bit excessive.
Ah, right.
So, I guess trying to set the personality or trying to exec a trivial
32-bit binary would answer that.
You could ship a trivial static binary with docker for that: trying
to run a whole container is probably overkill.
If trying to set the personality is more convenient though, that seems
an equally good approach in practice.
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 7:36 Detecting AArch32 support from a AArch64 process in user space Stefan Agner
2019-08-08 9:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-08 9:15 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-08 10:22 ` Stefan Agner
2019-08-08 10:41 ` Stefan Agner
2019-08-08 10:17 ` Stefan Agner
2019-08-08 11:31 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-08 9:35 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-08 10:30 ` Stefan Agner
2019-08-08 11:28 ` Dave Martin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190808112817.GH10425@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).