From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12936C32753 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93AA205F4 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="a08oJwi+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D93AA205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wg5Fae3HvmU7slMJVCZdDfrxkxIbZiC5J7OXLlk0QIg=; b=a08oJwi+qrDWrW d7qauReBI5Zq87ybF6iqRQs/puqLheJlBMdUoiEjt3yt3PhIsThCfYbeuiKaNrd48gYjXQNHtpX+i 95Ad5168DQzgaD8OCpMLJDUtMgbiDSi4aWmSi223jlpBGvnMc46D0jQQv7H9T8Bpqd9gC2F9ETxpH wP4cemNx6HXdaR8NmPQji4hlnGp7kglEzIGDo368rwfFPBUa/tIlxUYSTNP1x6aAY4sTAPEIKt0+m 14OkN8AD/YiTPqVu2HSrwpeg2c8rMYeLaHqk5nmFKwGZ42rh21Q3AlwCsHh+mhV9WAaEnbuz6kEsn iVVUNVTI6RoVKlZMp6IA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxrTA-0008JK-03; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:29:32 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxrT6-0008J0-Sq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:29:30 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E3928; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 04:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D45B3F706; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 04:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:29:24 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fix issues with 52-bit kernel virtual addressing Message-ID: <20190814112924.GD17931@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190813170149.26037-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190813170149.26037-1-will@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190814_042928_976203_0B51E1D0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.93 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Steve Capper , Andrey Konovalov , Geert Uytterhoeven , Catalin Marinas , Qian Cai , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:01:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch series addresses some issues with 52-bit kernel VAs reported > by Qian Cai and Geert. It's all confined to asm/memory.h and I got a bit > carried away cleaning that thing up so the patches get more worthless > as you go through the series. Still, I'd like to queue this on top of > the 52-bit VA stuff currently sitting in -next. > > Although Geert and Steve tested my initial hacks, I dropped the tags > because I've split things up and could've easily broken things again. > > Cheers, > > Will > > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Steve Capper > Cc: Qian Cai > Cc: Andrey Konovalov > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Other than the comments I've made, for the series: Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland If you want, I can spin a fix / cleanup for the VA_START issues I mentioned atop of this series. Thanks, Mark. > > --->8 > > Will Deacon (8): > arm64: memory: Fix virt_addr_valid() using __is_lm_address() > arm64: memory: Ensure address tag is masked in conversion macros > arm64: memory: Rewrite default page_to_virt()/virt_to_page() > arm64: memory: Simplify virt_to_page() implementation > arm64: memory: Simplify _VA_START and _PAGE_OFFSET definitions > arm64: memory: Implement __tag_set() as common function > arm64: memory: Add comments to end of non-trivial #ifdef blocks > arm64: memory: Cosmetic cleanups > > arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.11.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel