Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] kprobes: adjust kprobe addr for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE

[Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>]

On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:45:24 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:

> 
> 
> Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > For KPROBES_ON_FTRACE case, we need to adjust the kprobe's addr
> > correspondingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/kprobes.c | 10 +++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 9873fc627d61..3fd2f68644da 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -1484,15 +1484,19 @@ static inline int check_kprobe_rereg(struct kprobe *p)
> >
> >  int __weak arch_check_ftrace_location(struct kprobe *p)
> >  {
> > -     unsigned long ftrace_addr;
> > +     unsigned long ftrace_addr, addr = (unsigned long)p->addr;
> >
> > -     ftrace_addr = ftrace_location((unsigned long)p->addr);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> > +     addr = ftrace_call_adjust(addr);
> > +#endif  
> 
> Looking at the commit message for patch 3/3, it looks like you want the
> probe to be placed on ftrace entry by default, and this patch seems to
> be aimed at that.

Yeah.

> 
> If so, this is not the right approach. As I mentioned previously, you
> would want to over-ride kprobe_lookup_name(). This ensures that the
> address is changed only if the user provided a symbol, and not if the
> user wanted to probe at a very specific address. See commit

Great! Now I understand the reason.

> 24bd909e94776 ("powerpc/kprobes: Prefer ftrace when probing function
> entry").

Now, I got your meaning. You are right. I will update the patch in newer
version.

Thanks a lot!

> 
> If this patch is for some other purpose, then it isn't clear from the
> commit log. Please provide a better explanation.
> 
> 
> - Naveen
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel