public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@arm.com>
Cc: raph.gault+kdev@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 09/18] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:05:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822200504.x4unrhw36buwvdmg@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190816122403.14994-10-raphael.gault@arm.com>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:23:54PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> This plugins comes into play before the final 2 RTL passes of GCC and

"plugin"

> detects switch-tables that are to be outputed in the ELF and writes
> information in an "objtool_data" section which will be used by objtool.

The section should probably have a ".discard" prefix
(.discard.objtool_data) so it gets discarded at link time.

Also, "objtool_data" is a bit generic.  How about
".discard.switch_tables" or something.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@arm.com>
> ---
>  scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins                  |  2 +
>  scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig                   |  9 +++
>  .../arm64_switch_table_detection_plugin.c     | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 scripts/gcc-plugins/arm64_switch_table_detection_plugin.c
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins b/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins
> index 5f7df50cfe7a..a56736df9dc2 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_ARM_SSP_PER_TASK
>  endif
>  export DISABLE_ARM_SSP_PER_TASK_PLUGIN
>  
> +gcc-plugin-$(CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_SWITCH_TABLES)	+= arm64_switch_table_detection_plugin.so
> +
>  # All the plugin CFLAGS are collected here in case a build target needs to
>  # filter them out of the KBUILD_CFLAGS.
>  GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS := $(strip $(addprefix -fplugin=$(objtree)/scripts/gcc-plugins/, $(gcc-plugin-y)) $(gcc-plugin-cflags-y))
> diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig b/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
> index d33de0b9f4f5..1daeffb55dce 100644
> --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
> +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/Kconfig
> @@ -113,4 +113,13 @@ config GCC_PLUGIN_ARM_SSP_PER_TASK
>  	bool
>  	depends on GCC_PLUGINS && ARM
>  
> +config GCC_PLUGIN_SWITCH_TABLES
> +	bool "GCC Plugin: Identify switch tables at compile time"
> +	default y
> +	depends on STACK_VALIDATION && ARM64
> +	help
> +	  Plugin to identify switch tables generated at compile time and store
> +	  them in a .objtool_data section. Objtool will then use that section
> +	  to analyse the different execution path of the switch table.

This isn't something you want to ask the user about, as objtool for
arm64 requires it.  For the same reason, instead of
GCC_PLUGIN_SWITCH_TABLES depending on STACK_VALIDATION, arm64
HAVE_STACK_VALIDATION should depend on GCC_PLUGIN_SWITCH_TABLES.

-- 
Josh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-16 12:23 [RFC v4 00/18] objtool: Add support for arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 01/18] objtool: Add abstraction for computation of symbols offsets Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 16:30   ` Julien
2019-08-22 19:57   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 02/18] objtool: orc: Refactor ORC API for other architectures to implement Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 19:59   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 03/18] objtool: Move registers and control flow to arch-dependent code Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:00   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 04/18] objtool: arm64: Add required implementation for supporting the aarch64 architecture in objtool Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:00   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 05/18] objtool: special: Adapt special section handling Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:02   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-22 20:18   ` Julien
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 06/18] objtool: arm64: Adapt the stack frame checks for arm architecture Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:03   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 07/18] objtool: Introduce INSN_UNKNOWN type Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:04   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-22 20:45     ` Julien
2019-08-22 21:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 08/18] objtool: Refactor switch-tables code to support other architectures Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:04   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 09/18] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 10/18] objtool: arm64: Implement functions to add switch tables alternatives Raphael Gault
2019-08-23 16:35   ` Julien
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 11/18] arm64: alternative: Mark .altinstr_replacement as containing executable instructions Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 12/18] arm64: assembler: Add macro to annotate asm function having non standard stack-frame Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:10   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 13/18] arm64: sleep: Prevent stack frame warnings from objtool Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:16   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 14/18] arm64: kvm: Annotate non-standard stack frame functions Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 15/18] arm64: kernel: Add exception on kuser32 to prevent stack analysis Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 16/18] arm64: crypto: Add exceptions for crypto object " Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:19   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 17/18] arm64: kernel: Annotate non-standard stack frame functions Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 18/18] objtool: arm64: Enable stack validation for arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 19:56 ` [RFC v4 00/18] objtool: Add support " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-23 12:00   ` Raphael Gault
2019-10-14  8:37 ` Julien Thierry
2019-10-14 13:27   ` Raphaël Gault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190822200504.x4unrhw36buwvdmg@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raph.gault+kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=raphael.gault@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox