From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] improve the concurrency of arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain()
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190823024551.24448-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
v2 --> v3:
As Will Deacon's suggestion, I changed the lock type of
arm_smmu_domain.devices_lock from spinlock_t to rwlock_t, and I saw that the
performance is all right. And further use nr_ats_masters to quickly check have
no obvious effect, so I drop it.
Here is the performance data tested on my board:
Withou any change:
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [9798M/0K /s] [2392K/0 iops] [09h:59m:13s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [9782M/0K /s] [2388K/0 iops] [09h:59m:12s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [9825M/0K /s] [2399K/0 iops] [09h:59m:11s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [9836M/0K /s] [2401K/0 iops] [09h:59m:10s]
Change lock type from spinlock_t to rwlock_t:
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [10996M/0K /s] [2685K/0 iops] [09h:59m:13s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [10817M/0K /s] [2641K/0 iops] [09h:59m:12s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [11083M/0K /s] [2706K/0 iops] [09h:59m:11s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10603M/0K /s] [2589K/0 iops] [09h:59m:10s]
Use nr_ats_masters:
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [11105M/0K /s] [2711K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:40s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10511M/0K /s] [2566K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:39s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10560M/0K /s] [2578K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:38s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10494M/0K /s] [2562K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:37s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10528M/0K /s] [2570K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:36s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [10638M/0K /s] [2597K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:35s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11158M/0K /s] [2724K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:34s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11386M/0K /s] [2780K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:32s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11118M/0K /s] [2714K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:32s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11031M/0K /s] [2693K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:31s]
Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11361M/0K /s] [2774K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:30s]
v1 --> v2:
1. change the type of nr_ats_masters from atomic_t to int, and move its
ind/dec operation from arm_smmu_enable_ats()/arm_smmu_disable_ats() to
arm_smmu_attach_dev()/arm_smmu_detach_dev(), and protected by
"spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);"
Zhen Lei (2):
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: don't add a master into smmu_domain before it's
ready
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: change the lock type of
arm_smmu_domain.devices_lock
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-23 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-23 2:45 Zhen Lei [this message]
2019-08-23 2:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: don't add a master into smmu_domain before it's ready Zhen Lei
2019-08-23 2:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: change the lock type of arm_smmu_domain.devices_lock Zhen Lei
2019-08-23 7:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] improve the concurrency of arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain() Will Deacon
2019-08-23 8:06 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2019-08-23 8:37 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-23 9:05 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2019-09-17 14:35 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190823024551.24448-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox