From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506E1C3A5A2 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 259C5215EA for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VJsKj44d" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 259C5215EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=/wLhbUXSyxEHqcZaQgvI1XQP6HTepcZqtIN1bhMGajw=; b=VJsKj44d1tsNm4 4c9VygUyiapqPg1ixy+XLkK12GWXDGoYIM3i6DZwygChvWSZsqoKo41ejctgRZn+MhiOu8luAQIxA oUaCXCKnQ/Sl1F7MGYCP88y2uZLjupLO2yG9sIAV/rZsV9R0vv8p1eSWqfGBW3xRT/xiMabJCHIB/ WlLD/Py5rbwMPj6AphfDzGcD0GLJC3du2QAyOW5P2+djNySIRGalspVUR0VKYvlniqa4C/7DitjMV OPnscJIUY0/TQp48gWrsGTdZpmgFyL4C7yTM4sTj5TFxpe5Qkn5kTPpMTou031IkI2PoFUy2564qk m044VY/LdJbQs0lffu+w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i58fs-0000TC-HS; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:16:44 +0000 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i58fp-0000SZ-35 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:16:42 +0000 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA52280CF; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:16:32 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 01/10] dt-bindings: omap: add new binding for PRM instances Message-ID: <20190903131632.GL52127@atomide.com> References: <20190830121816.30034-1-t-kristo@ti.com> <20190830121816.30034-2-t-kristo@ti.com> <20190902042631.GA22055@bogus> <7c2c8a4d-d24e-ceec-afc1-04cdc4d5d952@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c2c8a4d-d24e-ceec-afc1-04cdc4d5d952@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190903_061641_178424_E070478F X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.28 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-omap , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org * Tero Kristo [190903 08:15]: > On 03/09/2019 11:10, Rob Herring wrote: > > I prefer that bindings be complete as possible even if driver support > > is not there yet. Adding power domain support may only mean adding > > '#power-domain-cells'. > > > > The location is fine then. > > Yeah, I assume just adding power-domain-cells should be enough. I am not too > sure before I start trying this out though so did not want to add it yet. Should we call the device tree node name power-controller instead of reset controller though? Most of the PRM instances do not have a separate rstctrl reset control functionality. Anybody got better any better naming in mind? Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel