From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4B9C4740C for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B40218AF for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="j/OjL2HU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="m4C6Xk/j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E6B40218AF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=hNXDMsNyPmpz9trh+CEqb9LPL56ipTFpgv6cOUd7sMY=; b=j/OjL2HUBgmY2J h/DTEjcNHDYvYKzStzyJdCF+d1N4NXO/lUv1iZhROK9evv5FY0+VJfm6NiP7XZqiDmDPOxX2RsEMW YN+74UTQdf1qLni1gB/smv+yNmw4DL5Nxx+cEk8Z+UsrkzVKPCS725Nar2sPL/Pi99QibDqmDft4j ZoQuHnXUG9Qf+jszSuV1Kp0rEoToP3ItKkweYe3r2wM1qqYcgQN2+FOiFbMLr+2+T9GX8iVFuzZ5o 1NQHhsNrrKuG8TqJqMlsRhCMsvPsD0ExZH38axqDl0zPf6nmWz6j0//wCSp2wtXdBmaQ6eXQTzpOK PQJq9LJ8YCSgDE2x8QwQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i7JL1-0008Tx-D7; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:04:11 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i7JKu-0008TA-Rc for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:04:07 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id h7so12742781wrw.8 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 06:04:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9y+22Q8ixtWcD5ju9SRyneHTrf2Ur/gcyX9aL38jrJ8=; b=m4C6Xk/j6j5iR6qiDeoF0BoZ6vmChDvg4ZUHZGDPPwDvfBnH1hKZmBSsAOTdCvvTO5 YGmDb1lmCn/E7iSQ2S005YmgvIXL6rJbsyQgRfPg4H0/AGqpD8RkFK70n78chiLKok4j 9iL8/W1WCvuhRISx3B5OGOWhEZXUlf2csBCJcGau5vnsnHn3+C3vB4/PyfCivyH0JOq2 L3ncuaHISdM5M2NBHFdwN3QXXUrSX7QaRTFGQALc+GA2gmQ1WkwdYd3r6se4/AmZyqke T6QE2eE7qidPUOKEHCh9mXFY4tzbH0HFJ6InTMQBgxvX0pKHNTKXtPkX+H1dXJK21H9K n6Og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9y+22Q8ixtWcD5ju9SRyneHTrf2Ur/gcyX9aL38jrJ8=; b=rwb+hpLYdROmeojwy2riTyozPiKU/NSSceuaHPlg2GOeEKE12DMZXrTXEj1xCLmF57 ao1QnmV1Rg6I/3mOUT3m3p5hQ6iNpYzS78s8CSCXdCXF0umy9Zwwx1rW34/S5FIbGJ+0 +k6xC9OQmYM9/yLe6HxDLiM1J9EAr9CxRKlSlC9HPMrdmbmFwaO4KnHl5QvEBdcPeNKd cYgE1W+Lw1IA7M1sBNQZ/mV+IFfrE+OnxcCYU+Iogkr+6CY47BKCIJHiQ9GZ0tao50Sd Z584M+vCZpqLggr0Yh829urHfBhwdXRUetlcTyKw2qd3R0zkf6BLZ1vnEnV2pYNfP377 pOZg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWP4oS3n2OyxEddtecmm7smujV4px1yQoPWZfxqEhk6MlVsWDm/ saOzsP0R3Jhi/Y4v5AcplPJhYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwk/hc+u/zqnHFB7vI8hYnVgaNIR9Xf1U5ML8a8gIMOmTBbmhFEHswaAoqNvRMqTbL5YHIWKw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f88e:: with SMTP id u14mr18227770wrp.260.1568034242622; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 06:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from holly.lan (cpc141214-aztw34-2-0-cust773.18-1.cable.virginm.net. [86.9.19.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm15033405wmh.9.2019.09.09.06.04.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 06:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:04:00 +0100 From: Daniel Thompson To: Jean-Jacques Hiblot Subject: Re: Status of led-backlight driver Message-ID: <20190909130400.erccomveu2ongeks@holly.lan> References: <20190907100726.GA12763@amd> <20190909111410.dwqvg6b4lgxymn2o@holly.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190909_060405_141672_934CD8E2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mpartap@gmx.net, tony@atomide.com, merlijn@wizzup.org, kernel list , sre@kernel.org, nekit1000@gmail.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, Pavel Machek , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:46:39PM +0200, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 09/09/2019 13:14, Daniel Thompson wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 12:07:27PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I don't see the LED-backlight driver in -next. Could it be pushed? It > > > is one of last pieces to get working backlight on Motorola Droid 4... > > Sorry, I dropped the ball on this and was therefore rather late > > reviewing this patchset. > > > > Assuming I have read the code correctly I think there are some > > problems with the max_brightness handling in the backlight code. > > Can you comment this? I'll be happy to fix the problem. I did that before replying to the nudges. See: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20190909095304.67ehnpg6gckwpno4@holly.lan/ > Reading the v4 again, I noticed that that I still had not removed the > brightness scaling. Is that the problem ? Yes (plus a couple of nits). Daniel. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel