* [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL
[not found] <20190801010450.27863-1-neolynx@gmail.com>
@ 2019-08-01 1:04 ` André Roth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: André Roth @ 2019-08-01 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neolynx
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Kevin Hilman, Thara Gopinath, Shweta Gulati,
linux-arm-kernel
From: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
index 6787f1e72c6b..1dae906128c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
@@ -43,8 +43,15 @@
static bool is_offset_valid;
static u8 smps_offset;
+/*
+ * Flag to ensure Smartreflex bit in TWL
+ * being cleared in board file is not overwritten.
+ */
+static bool __initdata twl_sr_enable_autoinit;
+#define TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG 0x06
#define REG_SMPS_OFFSET 0xE0
+#define SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE BIT(3)
static unsigned long twl4030_vsel_to_uv(const u8 vsel)
{
@@ -241,6 +248,18 @@ int __init omap3_twl_init(void)
if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * The smartreflex bit on twl4030 specifies if the setting of voltage
+ * is done over the I2C_SR path. Since this setting is independent of
+ * the actual usage of smartreflex AVS module, we enable TWL SR bit
+ * by default irrespective of whether smartreflex AVS module is enabled
+ * on the OMAP side or not. This is because without this bit enabled,
+ * the voltage scaling through vp forceupdate/bypass mechanism of
+ * voltage scaling will not function on TWL over I2C_SR.
+ */
+ if (!twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
+ omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(true);
+
voltdm = voltdm_lookup("mpu_iva");
omap_voltage_register_pmic(voltdm, &omap3_mpu_pmic);
@@ -249,3 +268,44 @@ int __init omap3_twl_init(void)
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * omap3_twl_set_sr_bit() - Set/Clear SR bit on TWL
+ * @enable: enable SR mode in twl or not
+ *
+ * If 'enable' is true, enables Smartreflex bit on TWL 4030 to make sure
+ * voltage scaling through OMAP SR works. Else, the smartreflex bit
+ * on twl4030 is cleared as there are platforms which use OMAP3 and T2 but
+ * use Synchronized Scaling Hardware Strategy (ENABLE_VMODE=1) and Direct
+ * Strategy Software Scaling Mode (ENABLE_VMODE=0), for setting the voltages,
+ * in those scenarios this bit is to be cleared (enable = false).
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on sucess, error is returned if I2C read/write fails.
+ */
+int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
+{
+ u8 temp;
+ int ret;
+ if (twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
+ pr_warning("%s: unexpected multiple calls\n", __func__);
+
+ ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
+ TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ if (enable)
+ temp |= SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
+ else
+ temp &= ~SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
+
+ ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
+ TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+ if (!ret) {
+ twl_sr_enable_autoinit = true;
+ return 0;
+ }
+err:
+ pr_err("%s: Error access to TWL4030 (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL
[not found] <20190801012823.28730-1-neolynx@gmail.com>
@ 2019-08-01 1:28 ` André Roth
2019-09-12 18:59 ` Adam Ford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: André Roth @ 2019-08-01 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Kevin Hilman, Thara Gopinath, Shweta Gulati,
linux-arm-kernel
From: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
index 6787f1e72c6b..1dae906128c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
@@ -43,8 +43,15 @@
static bool is_offset_valid;
static u8 smps_offset;
+/*
+ * Flag to ensure Smartreflex bit in TWL
+ * being cleared in board file is not overwritten.
+ */
+static bool __initdata twl_sr_enable_autoinit;
+#define TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG 0x06
#define REG_SMPS_OFFSET 0xE0
+#define SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE BIT(3)
static unsigned long twl4030_vsel_to_uv(const u8 vsel)
{
@@ -241,6 +248,18 @@ int __init omap3_twl_init(void)
if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
return -ENODEV;
+ /*
+ * The smartreflex bit on twl4030 specifies if the setting of voltage
+ * is done over the I2C_SR path. Since this setting is independent of
+ * the actual usage of smartreflex AVS module, we enable TWL SR bit
+ * by default irrespective of whether smartreflex AVS module is enabled
+ * on the OMAP side or not. This is because without this bit enabled,
+ * the voltage scaling through vp forceupdate/bypass mechanism of
+ * voltage scaling will not function on TWL over I2C_SR.
+ */
+ if (!twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
+ omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(true);
+
voltdm = voltdm_lookup("mpu_iva");
omap_voltage_register_pmic(voltdm, &omap3_mpu_pmic);
@@ -249,3 +268,44 @@ int __init omap3_twl_init(void)
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * omap3_twl_set_sr_bit() - Set/Clear SR bit on TWL
+ * @enable: enable SR mode in twl or not
+ *
+ * If 'enable' is true, enables Smartreflex bit on TWL 4030 to make sure
+ * voltage scaling through OMAP SR works. Else, the smartreflex bit
+ * on twl4030 is cleared as there are platforms which use OMAP3 and T2 but
+ * use Synchronized Scaling Hardware Strategy (ENABLE_VMODE=1) and Direct
+ * Strategy Software Scaling Mode (ENABLE_VMODE=0), for setting the voltages,
+ * in those scenarios this bit is to be cleared (enable = false).
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on sucess, error is returned if I2C read/write fails.
+ */
+int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
+{
+ u8 temp;
+ int ret;
+ if (twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
+ pr_warning("%s: unexpected multiple calls\n", __func__);
+
+ ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
+ TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ if (enable)
+ temp |= SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
+ else
+ temp &= ~SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
+
+ ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
+ TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+ if (!ret) {
+ twl_sr_enable_autoinit = true;
+ return 0;
+ }
+err:
+ pr_err("%s: Error access to TWL4030 (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
+ return ret;
+}
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL
2019-08-01 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL André Roth
@ 2019-09-12 18:59 ` Adam Ford
2019-09-12 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adam Ford @ 2019-09-12 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: André Roth
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Kevin Hilman, Tony Lindgren, H. Nikolaus Schaller,
Shweta Gulati, Thara Gopinath, Linux-OMAP, arm-soc
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM André Roth <neolynx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
>
> Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
> Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
> default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
> and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
> the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
> ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
> the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tony,
Is there a status update on this series? It's been several months,
and I haven't seen any feedback on it, nor does it appear to be in any
of your branches that I can see.
adam
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
> index 6787f1e72c6b..1dae906128c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,15 @@
>
> static bool is_offset_valid;
> static u8 smps_offset;
> +/*
> + * Flag to ensure Smartreflex bit in TWL
> + * being cleared in board file is not overwritten.
> + */
> +static bool __initdata twl_sr_enable_autoinit;
>
> +#define TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG 0x06
> #define REG_SMPS_OFFSET 0xE0
> +#define SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE BIT(3)
>
> static unsigned long twl4030_vsel_to_uv(const u8 vsel)
> {
> @@ -241,6 +248,18 @@ int __init omap3_twl_init(void)
> if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /*
> + * The smartreflex bit on twl4030 specifies if the setting of voltage
> + * is done over the I2C_SR path. Since this setting is independent of
> + * the actual usage of smartreflex AVS module, we enable TWL SR bit
> + * by default irrespective of whether smartreflex AVS module is enabled
> + * on the OMAP side or not. This is because without this bit enabled,
> + * the voltage scaling through vp forceupdate/bypass mechanism of
> + * voltage scaling will not function on TWL over I2C_SR.
> + */
> + if (!twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
> + omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(true);
> +
> voltdm = voltdm_lookup("mpu_iva");
> omap_voltage_register_pmic(voltdm, &omap3_mpu_pmic);
>
> @@ -249,3 +268,44 @@ int __init omap3_twl_init(void)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * omap3_twl_set_sr_bit() - Set/Clear SR bit on TWL
> + * @enable: enable SR mode in twl or not
> + *
> + * If 'enable' is true, enables Smartreflex bit on TWL 4030 to make sure
> + * voltage scaling through OMAP SR works. Else, the smartreflex bit
> + * on twl4030 is cleared as there are platforms which use OMAP3 and T2 but
> + * use Synchronized Scaling Hardware Strategy (ENABLE_VMODE=1) and Direct
> + * Strategy Software Scaling Mode (ENABLE_VMODE=0), for setting the voltages,
> + * in those scenarios this bit is to be cleared (enable = false).
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on sucess, error is returned if I2C read/write fails.
> + */
> +int __init omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(bool enable)
> +{
> + u8 temp;
> + int ret;
> + if (twl_sr_enable_autoinit)
> + pr_warning("%s: unexpected multiple calls\n", __func__);
> +
> + ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
> + TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (enable)
> + temp |= SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
> + else
> + temp &= ~SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
> +
> + ret = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
> + TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
> + if (!ret) {
> + twl_sr_enable_autoinit = true;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +err:
> + pr_err("%s: Error access to TWL4030 (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
> + return ret;
> +}
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL
2019-09-12 18:59 ` Adam Ford
@ 2019-09-12 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-09-13 15:11 ` Adam Ford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2019-09-12 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adam Ford
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Kevin Hilman, H. Nikolaus Schaller, Shweta Gulati,
André Roth, Thara Gopinath, Linux-OMAP, arm-soc
* Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [190912 19:00]:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM André Roth <neolynx@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> >
> > Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
> > Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
> > default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
> > and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
> > the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
> > ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
> > the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>
> Tony,
>
> Is there a status update on this series? It's been several months,
> and I haven't seen any feedback on it, nor does it appear to be in any
> of your branches that I can see.
Well it was tagged RFC.. Does something need updating
with it?
At least the first two patches looked OK to me.
Regards,
Tony
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL
2019-09-12 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
@ 2019-09-13 15:11 ` Adam Ford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adam Ford @ 2019-09-13 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lindgren
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Kevin Hilman, H. Nikolaus Schaller, Shweta Gulati,
André Roth, Thara Gopinath, Linux-OMAP, arm-soc
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [190912 19:00]:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM André Roth <neolynx@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > >
> > > Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
> > > Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
> > > default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
> > > and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
> > > the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
> > > ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
> > > the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> >
> > Tony,
> >
> > Is there a status update on this series? It's been several months,
> > and I haven't seen any feedback on it, nor does it appear to be in any
> > of your branches that I can see.
>
> Well it was tagged RFC.. Does something need updating
> with it?
I didn't notice the RTC until you pointed out the 0/3 file showed the RFC.
Andre - since you have sign-off by various TI people and Tony seems
satisfied, would you be will to re-base and push the patch series
without the RFC?
I think some of the work that H Nikolaus Schaller is doing will
benefit from this.
Thank you,
adam
>
> At least the first two patches looked OK to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-13 15:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190801012823.28730-1-neolynx@gmail.com>
2019-08-01 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL André Roth
2019-09-12 18:59 ` Adam Ford
2019-09-12 21:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-09-13 15:11 ` Adam Ford
[not found] <20190801010450.27863-1-neolynx@gmail.com>
2019-08-01 1:04 ` André Roth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).