From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D82BC49ED7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED082067D for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="h1FshC8E" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4ED082067D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vnx4XtlMcIIqxGtJnVhfB3f9oarwnnTUStoaubInUL4=; b=h1FshC8ExT6ihE 6I16vcVZ8oth+Jz+jlL31jrdbch+8pFdZXS7MfXB7H+xN0nID7AjhCPWLS4UFspMuZBiw8STqvE55 tmI1510e163SCAwkCPj6kLOk2ddE2K9Nu2rJfxuHea1QyryULUgA35XNG7z8CaslTzSZ1IFmlGOYH NfxwqsLm2/xxgVbzrVcaNB8jAh0KQ1ssYv00CyaNE8exqNj2vPqMh0uKaT3C8tQ0dNQzaXl5ZFfXa crGEah65f5AYkwx4X/Raz7HFq9AoXynewAWnjWGbhYZDvnHBcI+9OKIOm6ISXbdIwLxiFeqK0LflN hcUsJmyEh7rRTQTmzZHw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i9o2N-0007Ly-O6; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:15:15 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i9o2K-0007LL-Ek for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:15:13 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3683B1000; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 03:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAAC83F59C; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 03:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:15:05 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Sujeet Kumar Baranwal Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: SCMI & Devfreq Message-ID: <20190916101505.GB6109@bogus> References: <20190913102304.GC2559@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190916_031512_540940_084D0F10 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:22:02AM +0000, Sujeet Kumar Baranwal wrote: > Thanks Sudeep. > >>> Good, but just a quick question to check if this is ACPI or DT based >>> platform ? > > DT based. > Good. >>> Yes it needs some work and I do have some prototype, but with no users in >>> the upstream, I haven't added it yet. >>> What kind of devices are these ? There was some work around generic >>> devfreq driver that I had seen >>on the list and my plan was to do >>> something similar, I need to dig up details as it was while ago. > > These are devices needing dedicated clocks like dsp engines. There is a need > for a userspace dev governor controlling the frequency in different > situation. Okay, thanks for the info. > Could you please share your patches and any instructions if needed. > It needs some polishing before I post them externally, they are still hackish. I will do soonish. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel