From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] arm64: fix unreachable code issue with cmpxchg
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:34:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917203425.GA31423@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910115643.391995-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:56:22PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On arm64 build with clang, sometimes the __cmpxchg_mb is not inlined
> when CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is set.
> Clang then fails a compile-time assertion, because it cannot tell at
> compile time what the size of the argument is:
>
> mm/memcontrol.o: In function `__cmpxchg_mb':
> memcontrol.c:(.text+0x1a4c): undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_175'
> memcontrol.c:(.text+0x1a4c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `__compiletime_assert_175'
>
> Mark all of the cmpxchg() style functions as __always_inline to
> ensure that the compiler can see the result.
>
> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/648
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> v2: skip unneeded changes, as suggested by Andrew Murray
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index a1398f2f9994..f9bef42c1411 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ __XCHG_CASE( , , mb_, 64, dmb ish, nop, , a, l, "memory")
> #undef __XCHG_CASE
>
> #define __XCHG_GEN(sfx) \
> -static inline unsigned long __xchg##sfx(unsigned long x, \
> +static __always_inline unsigned long __xchg##sfx(unsigned long x, \
> volatile void *ptr, \
> int size) \
> { \
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ __CMPXCHG_DBL(_mb)
> #undef __CMPXCHG_DBL
>
> #define __CMPXCHG_GEN(sfx) \
> -static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg##sfx(volatile void *ptr, \
> +static __always_inline unsigned long __cmpxchg##sfx(volatile void *ptr, \
> unsigned long old, \
> unsigned long new, \
> int size) \
> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ __CMPWAIT_CASE( , , 64);
> #undef __CMPWAIT_CASE
>
> #define __CMPWAIT_GEN(sfx) \
> -static inline void __cmpwait##sfx(volatile void *ptr, \
> +static __always_inline void __cmpwait##sfx(volatile void *ptr, \
> unsigned long val, \
> int size) \
> { \
> --
> 2.20.0
>
Looks like the arm64 pull request happened without this patch so clang
all{mod,yes}config builds are broken. Did the maintainers have any
further comments on it or could this make it in with the next one?
Cheers,
Nathan
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 11:56 [PATCH] [v2] arm64: fix unreachable code issue with cmpxchg Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-17 20:34 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-09-18 9:02 ` Will Deacon
2019-09-18 16:02 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190917203425.GA31423@archlinux-threadripper \
--to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).